Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment
Measuring evaporation and transpiration at the field scale is complicated due to the heterogeneity of the environment, with point measurements requiring upscaling and field measurements such as eddy covariance measuring only the evapotranspiration. During the summer of 2014 an eddy covariance device...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0009 |
id |
doaj-019aef2cf18a4a43b779a114b1ec428f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-019aef2cf18a4a43b779a114b1ec428f2021-09-06T19:41:40ZengSciendoJournal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics0042-790X2020-06-0168213414310.2478/johh-2020-0009Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchmentHogan Patrick0Parajka Juraj1Heng Lee2Strauss Peter3Blöschl Günter4Centre for Water Resource Systems, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria.Centre for Water Resource Systems, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria.Soil and Water Management and Crop Nutrition Subprogramme, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 1400 Vienna, Austria.Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Federal Agency for Water Management, Pollnbergstrasse 1, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria.Centre for Water Resource Systems, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria.Measuring evaporation and transpiration at the field scale is complicated due to the heterogeneity of the environment, with point measurements requiring upscaling and field measurements such as eddy covariance measuring only the evapotranspiration. During the summer of 2014 an eddy covariance device was used to measure the evapotranspiration of a growing maize field at the HOAL catchment. The stable isotope technique and a Lagrangian near field theory (LNF) were then utilized to partition the evapotranspiration into evaporation and transpiration, using the concentration and isotopic ratio of water vapour within the canopy. The stable isotope estimates of the daily averages of the fraction of evapotranspiration (Ft) ranged from 43.0–88.5%, with an average value of 67.5%, while with the LNF method, Ft was found to range from 52.3–91.5% with an average value of 73.5%. Two different parameterizations for the turbulent statistics were used, with both giving similar R2 values, 0.65 and 0.63 for the Raupach and Leuning parameterizations, with the Raupach version performing slightly better. The stable isotope method demonstrated itself to be a more robust method, returning larger amounts of useable data, however this is limited by the requirement of much more additional data.https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0009evapotranspiration partitioningstable isotopeslagrangian dispersion theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hogan Patrick Parajka Juraj Heng Lee Strauss Peter Blöschl Günter |
spellingShingle |
Hogan Patrick Parajka Juraj Heng Lee Strauss Peter Blöschl Günter Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics evapotranspiration partitioning stable isotopes lagrangian dispersion theory |
author_facet |
Hogan Patrick Parajka Juraj Heng Lee Strauss Peter Blöschl Günter |
author_sort |
Hogan Patrick |
title |
Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
title_short |
Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
title_full |
Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
title_fullStr |
Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and Lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
title_sort |
partitioning evapotranspiration using stable isotopes and lagrangian dispersion analysis in a small agricultural catchment |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics |
issn |
0042-790X |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Measuring evaporation and transpiration at the field scale is complicated due to the heterogeneity of the environment, with point measurements requiring upscaling and field measurements such as eddy covariance measuring only the evapotranspiration. During the summer of 2014 an eddy covariance device was used to measure the evapotranspiration of a growing maize field at the HOAL catchment. The stable isotope technique and a Lagrangian near field theory (LNF) were then utilized to partition the evapotranspiration into evaporation and transpiration, using the concentration and isotopic ratio of water vapour within the canopy. The stable isotope estimates of the daily averages of the fraction of evapotranspiration (Ft) ranged from 43.0–88.5%, with an average value of 67.5%, while with the LNF method, Ft was found to range from 52.3–91.5% with an average value of 73.5%. Two different parameterizations for the turbulent statistics were used, with both giving similar R2 values, 0.65 and 0.63 for the Raupach and Leuning parameterizations, with the Raupach version performing slightly better. The stable isotope method demonstrated itself to be a more robust method, returning larger amounts of useable data, however this is limited by the requirement of much more additional data. |
topic |
evapotranspiration partitioning stable isotopes lagrangian dispersion theory |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hoganpatrick partitioningevapotranspirationusingstableisotopesandlagrangiandispersionanalysisinasmallagriculturalcatchment AT parajkajuraj partitioningevapotranspirationusingstableisotopesandlagrangiandispersionanalysisinasmallagriculturalcatchment AT henglee partitioningevapotranspirationusingstableisotopesandlagrangiandispersionanalysisinasmallagriculturalcatchment AT strausspeter partitioningevapotranspirationusingstableisotopesandlagrangiandispersionanalysisinasmallagriculturalcatchment AT bloschlgunter partitioningevapotranspirationusingstableisotopesandlagrangiandispersionanalysisinasmallagriculturalcatchment |
_version_ |
1717765628445589504 |