What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s

We extracted 327,322 faces from an archive of Time magazine containing 3,389 issues dating from 1923 to 2014, classified the gender of each extracted face, and discovered that the proportion of female faces contained within this archive varied in interesting ways over time. The proportion of female...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Jofre, Josh Cole, Vincent Berardi, Carl Bennett, Michael Reale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University
Series:Journal of Cultural Analytics
Online Access:http://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/12266-what-s-in-a-face-gender-representation-of-faces-in-time-1940s-1990s.pdf
id doaj-018ece27235c438e9d945d491830b788
record_format Article
spelling doaj-018ece27235c438e9d945d491830b7882020-11-25T01:57:34ZengDepartment of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill UniversityJournal of Cultural Analytics2371-4549What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990sAna JofreJosh ColeVincent BerardiCarl BennettMichael RealeWe extracted 327,322 faces from an archive of Time magazine containing 3,389 issues dating from 1923 to 2014, classified the gender of each extracted face, and discovered that the proportion of female faces contained within this archive varied in interesting ways over time. The proportion of female faces first peaked in the mid-to-late 1940s. This was followed by a dip lasting from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s. The 1970s saw another peak followed by a dip over the course of the 1980s. Finally, we see a slow and steady rise in the proportion of female faces from the early 1990s onwards. In this paper, we seek to make sense of these variations through an interdisciplinary framework drawing on psychology, visual studies (in particular, photography theory), and history. Through a close reading of our Time archive from the 1940s through the 1990s, we conclude that the visual representation of women in Time magazine correlates with attitudes toward women in both the historical context of the era and the textual content of the magazine.http://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/12266-what-s-in-a-face-gender-representation-of-faces-in-time-1940s-1990s.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Jofre
Josh Cole
Vincent Berardi
Carl Bennett
Michael Reale
spellingShingle Ana Jofre
Josh Cole
Vincent Berardi
Carl Bennett
Michael Reale
What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
Journal of Cultural Analytics
author_facet Ana Jofre
Josh Cole
Vincent Berardi
Carl Bennett
Michael Reale
author_sort Ana Jofre
title What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
title_short What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
title_full What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
title_fullStr What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
title_full_unstemmed What’s in a Face? Gender representation of faces in Time, 1940s-1990s
title_sort what’s in a face? gender representation of faces in time, 1940s-1990s
publisher Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University
series Journal of Cultural Analytics
issn 2371-4549
description We extracted 327,322 faces from an archive of Time magazine containing 3,389 issues dating from 1923 to 2014, classified the gender of each extracted face, and discovered that the proportion of female faces contained within this archive varied in interesting ways over time. The proportion of female faces first peaked in the mid-to-late 1940s. This was followed by a dip lasting from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s. The 1970s saw another peak followed by a dip over the course of the 1980s. Finally, we see a slow and steady rise in the proportion of female faces from the early 1990s onwards. In this paper, we seek to make sense of these variations through an interdisciplinary framework drawing on psychology, visual studies (in particular, photography theory), and history. Through a close reading of our Time archive from the 1940s through the 1990s, we conclude that the visual representation of women in Time magazine correlates with attitudes toward women in both the historical context of the era and the textual content of the magazine.
url http://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/12266-what-s-in-a-face-gender-representation-of-faces-in-time-1940s-1990s.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anajofre whatsinafacegenderrepresentationoffacesintime1940s1990s
AT joshcole whatsinafacegenderrepresentationoffacesintime1940s1990s
AT vincentberardi whatsinafacegenderrepresentationoffacesintime1940s1990s
AT carlbennett whatsinafacegenderrepresentationoffacesintime1940s1990s
AT michaelreale whatsinafacegenderrepresentationoffacesintime1940s1990s
_version_ 1724974105321537536