Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions

How can advocates of global democracy grapple with the empirical conditions that constitute world politics? I argue that flexibility mechanisms—;commonly used to advance international cooperation—should be employed to make the institutional design project of global democracy more tractable. I highli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan W. Kuyper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2013-12-01
Series:Ethics & Global Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/19163/31443
id doaj-017d988e734e4840aaae68de7990ab45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-017d988e734e4840aaae68de7990ab452020-11-25T01:33:06ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-49511654-63692013-12-016419521510.3402/egp.v6i4.1916319163Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisionsJonathan W. Kuyper0Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenHow can advocates of global democracy grapple with the empirical conditions that constitute world politics? I argue that flexibility mechanisms—;commonly used to advance international cooperation—should be employed to make the institutional design project of global democracy more tractable. I highlight three specific reasons underpinning this claim. First, flexibility provisions make bargaining over different institutional designs more manageable. Second, heightened flexibility takes seriously potential concerns about path-dependent institutional development. Finally, deliberately shortening the time horizons of agents by employing flexibility provisions has cognitive benefits as it forces designers to focus specifically on issues of feasibility as well as desirability. I discuss a range of flexibility mechanisms and highlight the utility of sunset provisions and escape clauses. From this analysis, I build an argument for the usage of small-scale democratic experiments through which citizens (or their representatives) have a say in global policy making.www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/19163/31443institutional designglobal democracyflexibilityglobal governancedemocratic experimentsdeliberative democracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan W. Kuyper
spellingShingle Jonathan W. Kuyper
Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
Ethics & Global Politics
institutional design
global democracy
flexibility
global governance
democratic experiments
deliberative democracy
author_facet Jonathan W. Kuyper
author_sort Jonathan W. Kuyper
title Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
title_short Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
title_full Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
title_fullStr Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
title_full_unstemmed Designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
title_sort designing institutions for global democracy: flexibility through escape clauses and sunset provisions
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Ethics & Global Politics
issn 1654-4951
1654-6369
publishDate 2013-12-01
description How can advocates of global democracy grapple with the empirical conditions that constitute world politics? I argue that flexibility mechanisms—;commonly used to advance international cooperation—should be employed to make the institutional design project of global democracy more tractable. I highlight three specific reasons underpinning this claim. First, flexibility provisions make bargaining over different institutional designs more manageable. Second, heightened flexibility takes seriously potential concerns about path-dependent institutional development. Finally, deliberately shortening the time horizons of agents by employing flexibility provisions has cognitive benefits as it forces designers to focus specifically on issues of feasibility as well as desirability. I discuss a range of flexibility mechanisms and highlight the utility of sunset provisions and escape clauses. From this analysis, I build an argument for the usage of small-scale democratic experiments through which citizens (or their representatives) have a say in global policy making.
topic institutional design
global democracy
flexibility
global governance
democratic experiments
deliberative democracy
url http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/19163/31443
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanwkuyper designinginstitutionsforglobaldemocracyflexibilitythroughescapeclausesandsunsetprovisions
_version_ 1725079395905830912