PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG

ABSTRACT This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Fahrudin
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Pamulang 2017-04-01
Series:Keberlanjutan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133
id doaj-017ae2b6b7b645e6bbffbca616d09d77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-017ae2b6b7b645e6bbffbca616d09d772021-05-11T14:19:45ZindUniversitas PamulangKeberlanjutan2528-55992614-32912017-04-0112515810.32493/keberlanjutan.v1i2.y2016.p51-5892PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANGAhmad Fahrudin0Universitas PamulangABSTRACT This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests and reliability testing. Before the data analyzed, first tested the requirement that test Lilliefors normality test and homogeneity test by using Fisher's exact test. Based on hypothesis testing using t test obtained t = 5,049 > 1,993 = t(0,05;73. This means H0 reject or accept H1. So, the results of this study concluded that there are differences math student’s learning outcomes that used Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique.http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmad Fahrudin
spellingShingle Ahmad Fahrudin
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
Keberlanjutan
keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw
author_facet Ahmad Fahrudin
author_sort Ahmad Fahrudin
title PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
title_short PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
title_full PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
title_fullStr PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
title_full_unstemmed PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
title_sort perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajarkan menggunakan quantum learning teknik mind mapping dengan cooperative learning teknik jigsaw di smp negeri 18 tangerang
publisher Universitas Pamulang
series Keberlanjutan
issn 2528-5599
2614-3291
publishDate 2017-04-01
description ABSTRACT This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests and reliability testing. Before the data analyzed, first tested the requirement that test Lilliefors normality test and homogeneity test by using Fisher's exact test. Based on hypothesis testing using t test obtained t = 5,049 > 1,993 = t(0,05;73. This means H0 reject or accept H1. So, the results of this study concluded that there are differences math student’s learning outcomes that used Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique.
topic keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw
url http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadfahrudin perbedaanhasilbelajarmatematikasiswayangdiajarkanmenggunakanquantumlearningteknikmindmappingdengancooperativelearningteknikjigsawdismpnegeri18tangerang
_version_ 1721444073118629888