PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
ABSTRACT This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
Universitas Pamulang
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Keberlanjutan |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133 |
id |
doaj-017ae2b6b7b645e6bbffbca616d09d77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-017ae2b6b7b645e6bbffbca616d09d772021-05-11T14:19:45ZindUniversitas PamulangKeberlanjutan2528-55992614-32912017-04-0112515810.32493/keberlanjutan.v1i2.y2016.p51-5892PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANGAhmad Fahrudin0Universitas PamulangABSTRACT This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests and reliability testing. Before the data analyzed, first tested the requirement that test Lilliefors normality test and homogeneity test by using Fisher's exact test. Based on hypothesis testing using t test obtained t = 5,049 > 1,993 = t(0,05;73. This means H0 reject or accept H1. So, the results of this study concluded that there are differences math student’s learning outcomes that used Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique.http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Indonesian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ahmad Fahrudin |
spellingShingle |
Ahmad Fahrudin PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG Keberlanjutan keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw |
author_facet |
Ahmad Fahrudin |
author_sort |
Ahmad Fahrudin |
title |
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG |
title_short |
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG |
title_full |
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG |
title_fullStr |
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG |
title_sort |
perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajarkan menggunakan quantum learning teknik mind mapping dengan cooperative learning teknik jigsaw di smp negeri 18 tangerang |
publisher |
Universitas Pamulang |
series |
Keberlanjutan |
issn |
2528-5599 2614-3291 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests and reliability testing. Before the data analyzed, first tested the requirement that test Lilliefors normality test and homogeneity test by using Fisher's exact test. Based on hypothesis testing using t test obtained t = 5,049 > 1,993 = t(0,05;73. This means H0 reject or accept H1. So, the results of this study concluded that there are differences math student’s learning outcomes that used Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. |
topic |
keywords: quantum learning, mind mapping, cooperative learning, jigsaw |
url |
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/keberlanjutan/article/view/133 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ahmadfahrudin perbedaanhasilbelajarmatematikasiswayangdiajarkanmenggunakanquantumlearningteknikmindmappingdengancooperativelearningteknikjigsawdismpnegeri18tangerang |
_version_ |
1721444073118629888 |