Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these r...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2010-04-01
|
Series: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt |
id |
doaj-017529faf90d44ca8e036b9968cefb57 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-017529faf90d44ca8e036b9968cefb572020-11-24T21:04:49ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroArquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 0100-86921809-52672010-04-0162197103Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanasApoliana Regina Groff0Kátia Maheirie1Andréa Vieira Zanella2Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these reflections arise the understanding that researching is a dialogical and ideological process, in which the research and the researcher are mutually constituted in the relation of authorship/alterity. We also comprehend that the production of knowledge is always a singular creation with collective contributions, and as the researcher signs the authorship of a research or text, he finds himself in a position of responding to the other and also of responsibility for what he has produced. Finally, we assert that the constitution of the researcher in human sciences has attributes peculiar to this field of knowledge, since his relation with the subjects and contexts researched is sustained by ethical, aesthetic and political choices.http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=ptResearcherHuman sciencesAuthorshipAlterityDialogism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Apoliana Regina Groff Kátia Maheirie Andréa Vieira Zanella |
spellingShingle |
Apoliana Regina Groff Kátia Maheirie Andréa Vieira Zanella Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia Researcher Human sciences Authorship Alterity Dialogism |
author_facet |
Apoliana Regina Groff Kátia Maheirie Andréa Vieira Zanella |
author_sort |
Apoliana Regina Groff |
title |
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
title_short |
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
title_full |
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
title_fullStr |
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
title_sort |
constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
series |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia |
issn |
0100-8692 1809-5267 |
publishDate |
2010-04-01 |
description |
The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these reflections arise the understanding that researching is a dialogical and ideological process, in which the research and the researcher are mutually constituted in the relation of authorship/alterity. We also comprehend that the production of knowledge is always a singular creation with collective contributions, and as the researcher signs the authorship of a research or text, he finds himself in a position of responding to the other and also of responsibility for what he has produced. Finally, we assert that the constitution of the researcher in human sciences has attributes peculiar to this field of knowledge, since his relation with the subjects and contexts researched is sustained by ethical, aesthetic and political choices. |
topic |
Researcher Human sciences Authorship Alterity Dialogism |
url |
http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT apolianareginagroff constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas AT katiamaheirie constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas AT andreavieirazanella constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas |
_version_ |
1716769667038576640 |