Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas

The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Apoliana Regina Groff, Kátia Maheirie, Andréa Vieira Zanella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 2010-04-01
Series:Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
id doaj-017529faf90d44ca8e036b9968cefb57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-017529faf90d44ca8e036b9968cefb572020-11-24T21:04:49ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroArquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 0100-86921809-52672010-04-0162197103Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanasApoliana Regina Groff0Kátia Maheirie1Andréa Vieira Zanella2Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these reflections arise the understanding that researching is a dialogical and ideological process, in which the research and the researcher are mutually constituted in the relation of authorship/alterity. We also comprehend that the production of knowledge is always a singular creation with collective contributions, and as the researcher signs the authorship of a research or text, he finds himself in a position of responding to the other and also of responsibility for what he has produced. Finally, we assert that the constitution of the researcher in human sciences has attributes peculiar to this field of knowledge, since his relation with the subjects and contexts researched is sustained by ethical, aesthetic and political choices.http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=ptResearcherHuman sciencesAuthorshipAlterityDialogism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Apoliana Regina Groff
Kátia Maheirie
Andréa Vieira Zanella
spellingShingle Apoliana Regina Groff
Kátia Maheirie
Andréa Vieira Zanella
Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia
Researcher
Human sciences
Authorship
Alterity
Dialogism
author_facet Apoliana Regina Groff
Kátia Maheirie
Andréa Vieira Zanella
author_sort Apoliana Regina Groff
title Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
title_short Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
title_full Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
title_fullStr Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
title_full_unstemmed Constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
title_sort constituição do(a) pesquisador(a) em ciências humanas
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
series Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia
issn 0100-8692
1809-5267
publishDate 2010-04-01
description The objective of this article is to present some reflections on the process of constitution of the researcher in human sciences, minted from a view anchored in the historical-cultural psychology, and in the dialogue with some of Bakhtin’s ideas and writings of some of his interlocutors. From these reflections arise the understanding that researching is a dialogical and ideological process, in which the research and the researcher are mutually constituted in the relation of authorship/alterity. We also comprehend that the production of knowledge is always a singular creation with collective contributions, and as the researcher signs the authorship of a research or text, he finds himself in a position of responding to the other and also of responsibility for what he has produced. Finally, we assert that the constitution of the researcher in human sciences has attributes peculiar to this field of knowledge, since his relation with the subjects and contexts researched is sustained by ethical, aesthetic and political choices.
topic Researcher
Human sciences
Authorship
Alterity
Dialogism
url http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
work_keys_str_mv AT apolianareginagroff constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas
AT katiamaheirie constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas
AT andreavieirazanella constituicaodoapesquisadoraemcienciashumanas
_version_ 1716769667038576640