The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons
<div>The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing as the pregnant population becomes older and more obese. Fifteen percent of GDM patients require medical intervention. Insulin is still the drug of choice because it has not been implicated as a teratogen in hum...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Indonesia
2014-04-01
|
Series: | Journal Kedokteran Indonesia |
Online Access: | http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/eJKI/article/view/3179 |
id |
doaj-0169f63e26be45f084f0f6378a3d19cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0169f63e26be45f084f0f6378a3d19cb2020-11-25T04:09:51ZengUniversitas IndonesiaJournal Kedokteran Indonesia2338-14262338-60372014-04-012110.23886/ejki.2.3179.2273The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and ConsBram PradiptaM. Andalas<div>The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing as the pregnant population becomes older and more obese. Fifteen percent of GDM patients require medical intervention. Insulin is still the drug of choice because it has not been implicated as a teratogen in human pregnancies.</div><div>Insulin has its disadvantages such as the need for injections, the risk of hypoglycaemia, excessive weight gain and the costs. The use of oral anti hyperglicemic agent (OAHA), traditionally contraindicated, now can be considered as an alternative for insulin which can be beneficial in developing countries. From four groups of OAHA, sulfonylurea and biguanides can be used during pregnancy. Studies and randomized controlled trial (RCT) have been done and most summarized that it does not increase any maternal and perinatal morbidity. Most data also show that there</div><div>are also no differences in glycemic control or pregnancy outcomes compared with insulin. There are conflicting data shows metformin increase prevalence of preeclampsia patient and perinatal morbidity. OAHA usage, although not yet recommended internationally, can be considered in GDM</div><div>patients with uncontrolled blood sugar levels that require medical intervention but can not use insulin. Well</div><div>conducted, prospective, controlled studies regarding its</div><div>feasibility in pregnant women with diabetes are still needed.</div><div><strong><br />Keywords</strong>:oral antihyperglycemic agent, gestational, diabetes</div>http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/eJKI/article/view/3179 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bram Pradipta M. Andalas |
spellingShingle |
Bram Pradipta M. Andalas The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons Journal Kedokteran Indonesia |
author_facet |
Bram Pradipta M. Andalas |
author_sort |
Bram Pradipta |
title |
The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons |
title_short |
The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons |
title_full |
The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons |
title_fullStr |
The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Usage of Oral Anti Hyperglycemic Agent in Gestational Diabetes: Pros and Cons |
title_sort |
usage of oral anti hyperglycemic agent in gestational diabetes: pros and cons |
publisher |
Universitas Indonesia |
series |
Journal Kedokteran Indonesia |
issn |
2338-1426 2338-6037 |
publishDate |
2014-04-01 |
description |
<div>The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing as the pregnant population becomes older and more obese. Fifteen percent of GDM patients require medical intervention. Insulin is still the drug of choice because it has not been implicated as a teratogen in human pregnancies.</div><div>Insulin has its disadvantages such as the need for injections, the risk of hypoglycaemia, excessive weight gain and the costs. The use of oral anti hyperglicemic agent (OAHA), traditionally contraindicated, now can be considered as an alternative for insulin which can be beneficial in developing countries. From four groups of OAHA, sulfonylurea and biguanides can be used during pregnancy. Studies and randomized controlled trial (RCT) have been done and most summarized that it does not increase any maternal and perinatal morbidity. Most data also show that there</div><div>are also no differences in glycemic control or pregnancy outcomes compared with insulin. There are conflicting data shows metformin increase prevalence of preeclampsia patient and perinatal morbidity. OAHA usage, although not yet recommended internationally, can be considered in GDM</div><div>patients with uncontrolled blood sugar levels that require medical intervention but can not use insulin. Well</div><div>conducted, prospective, controlled studies regarding its</div><div>feasibility in pregnant women with diabetes are still needed.</div><div><strong><br />Keywords</strong>:oral antihyperglycemic agent, gestational, diabetes</div> |
url |
http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/eJKI/article/view/3179 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brampradipta theusageoforalantihyperglycemicagentingestationaldiabetesprosandcons AT mandalas theusageoforalantihyperglycemicagentingestationaldiabetesprosandcons AT brampradipta usageoforalantihyperglycemicagentingestationaldiabetesprosandcons AT mandalas usageoforalantihyperglycemicagentingestationaldiabetesprosandcons |
_version_ |
1715038822383747072 |