Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model

The bone regeneration efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs) combined with xenografts in the craniofacial region remains unclear. Accordingly, this study commenced by comparing the cell morphology, cell proliferation, trilineage differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Chieh Lee, Ya-Hui Chan, Sung-Chih Hsieh, Wei-Zhen Lew, Sheng-Wei Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/20/5015
id doaj-01660990c6f343ffa50834bc02522260
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01660990c6f343ffa50834bc025222602020-11-25T02:03:58ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1422-00672019-10-012020501510.3390/ijms20205015ijms20205015Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect ModelYu-Chieh Lee0Ya-Hui Chan1Sung-Chih Hsieh2Wei-Zhen Lew3Sheng-Wei Feng4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, TaiwanThe bone regeneration efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs) combined with xenografts in the craniofacial region remains unclear. Accordingly, this study commenced by comparing the cell morphology, cell proliferation, trilineage differentiation, mineral synthesis, and osteogenic gene expression of BMSCs and DPSCs in vitro. Four experimental groups (empty control, Bio-Oss only, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and Bio-Oss+DPSCs) were then designed and implanted in rabbit calvarial defects. The BMSCs and DPSCs showed a similar morphology, proliferative ability, surface marker profile, and trilineage-differentiation potential in vitro. However, the BMSCs exhibited a higher mineral deposition and expression levels of osteogenic marker genes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), and osteocalcin (OCN). In the in vivo studies, the bone volume density in both MSC groups was significantly greater than that in the empty control or Bio-Oss only group. Moreover, the new bone formation and Collagen I / osteoprotegerin protein expressions of the scaffold+MSC groups were higher than those of the Bio-Oss only group. Finally, the Bio-Oss+BMSC and Bio-Oss+DPSC groups had a similar bone mineral density, new bone formation, and osteogenesis-related protein expression. Overall, the DPSCs seeded on Bio-Oss matched the bone regeneration efficacy of BMSCs in vivo and hence appear to be a promising strategy for craniofacial defect repair in future clinical applications.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/20/5015mesenchymal stem cellsdental pulp stem cellsbone marrow stem cellsbone regenerationcalvarial defect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu-Chieh Lee
Ya-Hui Chan
Sung-Chih Hsieh
Wei-Zhen Lew
Sheng-Wei Feng
spellingShingle Yu-Chieh Lee
Ya-Hui Chan
Sung-Chih Hsieh
Wei-Zhen Lew
Sheng-Wei Feng
Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
mesenchymal stem cells
dental pulp stem cells
bone marrow stem cells
bone regeneration
calvarial defect
author_facet Yu-Chieh Lee
Ya-Hui Chan
Sung-Chih Hsieh
Wei-Zhen Lew
Sheng-Wei Feng
author_sort Yu-Chieh Lee
title Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
title_short Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
title_full Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
title_fullStr Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
title_sort comparing the osteogenic potentials and bone regeneration capacities of bone marrow and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit calvarial bone defect model
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
issn 1422-0067
publishDate 2019-10-01
description The bone regeneration efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs) combined with xenografts in the craniofacial region remains unclear. Accordingly, this study commenced by comparing the cell morphology, cell proliferation, trilineage differentiation, mineral synthesis, and osteogenic gene expression of BMSCs and DPSCs in vitro. Four experimental groups (empty control, Bio-Oss only, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and Bio-Oss+DPSCs) were then designed and implanted in rabbit calvarial defects. The BMSCs and DPSCs showed a similar morphology, proliferative ability, surface marker profile, and trilineage-differentiation potential in vitro. However, the BMSCs exhibited a higher mineral deposition and expression levels of osteogenic marker genes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), and osteocalcin (OCN). In the in vivo studies, the bone volume density in both MSC groups was significantly greater than that in the empty control or Bio-Oss only group. Moreover, the new bone formation and Collagen I / osteoprotegerin protein expressions of the scaffold+MSC groups were higher than those of the Bio-Oss only group. Finally, the Bio-Oss+BMSC and Bio-Oss+DPSC groups had a similar bone mineral density, new bone formation, and osteogenesis-related protein expression. Overall, the DPSCs seeded on Bio-Oss matched the bone regeneration efficacy of BMSCs in vivo and hence appear to be a promising strategy for craniofacial defect repair in future clinical applications.
topic mesenchymal stem cells
dental pulp stem cells
bone marrow stem cells
bone regeneration
calvarial defect
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/20/5015
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchiehlee comparingtheosteogenicpotentialsandboneregenerationcapacitiesofbonemarrowanddentalpulpmesenchymalstemcellsinarabbitcalvarialbonedefectmodel
AT yahuichan comparingtheosteogenicpotentialsandboneregenerationcapacitiesofbonemarrowanddentalpulpmesenchymalstemcellsinarabbitcalvarialbonedefectmodel
AT sungchihhsieh comparingtheosteogenicpotentialsandboneregenerationcapacitiesofbonemarrowanddentalpulpmesenchymalstemcellsinarabbitcalvarialbonedefectmodel
AT weizhenlew comparingtheosteogenicpotentialsandboneregenerationcapacitiesofbonemarrowanddentalpulpmesenchymalstemcellsinarabbitcalvarialbonedefectmodel
AT shengweifeng comparingtheosteogenicpotentialsandboneregenerationcapacitiesofbonemarrowanddentalpulpmesenchymalstemcellsinarabbitcalvarialbonedefectmodel
_version_ 1724945453647134720