Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound

Abstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fei Chen, Fei Wang, Si Sun, Mei Zhu, Zheng Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1
id doaj-0164b86e1bac458380fdf520e396daef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0164b86e1bac458380fdf520e396daef2020-11-25T04:11:59ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2020-11-012011610.1186/s12876-020-01535-1Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasoundFei Chen0Fei Wang1Si Sun2Mei Zhu3Zheng Liu4Department of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical UniversityDepartment of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical UniversityDepartment of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical UniversityAbstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Methods Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. Results The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. Conclusion There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1Hepatocellular carcinomaSize measurementTwo-dimensional ultrasoundContrast enhanced ultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fei Chen
Fei Wang
Si Sun
Mei Zhu
Zheng Liu
spellingShingle Fei Chen
Fei Wang
Si Sun
Mei Zhu
Zheng Liu
Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
BMC Gastroenterology
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Size measurement
Two-dimensional ultrasound
Contrast enhanced ultrasound
author_facet Fei Chen
Fei Wang
Si Sun
Mei Zhu
Zheng Liu
author_sort Fei Chen
title Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
title_short Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
title_full Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
title_fullStr Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
title_sort size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Abstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Methods Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. Results The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. Conclusion There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle.
topic Hepatocellular carcinoma
Size measurement
Two-dimensional ultrasound
Contrast enhanced ultrasound
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1
work_keys_str_mv AT feichen sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound
AT feiwang sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound
AT sisun sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound
AT meizhu sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound
AT zhengliu sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound
_version_ 1724416199212662784