Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures

Societal infrastructures are the lifeblood of societies, and the sustainability of infrastructures is very important. Societal infrastructures can experience conflicting spatial claims with other societal infrastructures, disturbing the sustainable situation. The objective of this paper is to design...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ritsche Anne Kloosterman, Wijnand Veeneman, Jan Peter van der Hoek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/785
id doaj-015e879d721c4369812ae44ca076e0d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-015e879d721c4369812ae44ca076e0d62020-11-25T02:05:44ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-01-0112378510.3390/su12030785su12030785Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other InfrastructuresRitsche Anne Kloosterman0Wijnand Veeneman1Jan Peter van der Hoek2Vitens, Oude Veerweg 1, 8019 BE Zwolle, The NetherlandsDepartment of Multi-actor Systems, Section of Policy, Organization, Law and Gaming (POLG), Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, The NetherlandsSocietal infrastructures are the lifeblood of societies, and the sustainability of infrastructures is very important. Societal infrastructures can experience conflicting spatial claims with other societal infrastructures, disturbing the sustainable situation. The objective of this paper is to design large infrastructures, with a focus on the Drinking Water Infrastructure (DWI), in a more sustainable way by using the resilience concept. To study this, a case study was done in the Netherlands, where an overlap is present between the DWI and the protection zones, and a new railroad and water safety measures in the river IJssel. The case showed that conflicting infrastructures are inflexible and unable to adapt to change due to several reasons in the governance and in the infrastructure system itself. The case was useful for identifying eight design principles to prevent conflicting claims between large infrastructures.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/785societal infrastructuressustainabilityconflicting spatial claimsdesign principlesdrinking water protection zonesgroundwaterijsselzwollerailroadgovernance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ritsche Anne Kloosterman
Wijnand Veeneman
Jan Peter van der Hoek
spellingShingle Ritsche Anne Kloosterman
Wijnand Veeneman
Jan Peter van der Hoek
Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
Sustainability
societal infrastructures
sustainability
conflicting spatial claims
design principles
drinking water protection zones
groundwater
ijssel
zwolle
railroad
governance
author_facet Ritsche Anne Kloosterman
Wijnand Veeneman
Jan Peter van der Hoek
author_sort Ritsche Anne Kloosterman
title Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
title_short Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
title_full Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
title_fullStr Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Societal Infrastructures: A Resilient Approach to Prevent Conflicting Claims of Drinking Water and Other Infrastructures
title_sort sustainable societal infrastructures: a resilient approach to prevent conflicting claims of drinking water and other infrastructures
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Societal infrastructures are the lifeblood of societies, and the sustainability of infrastructures is very important. Societal infrastructures can experience conflicting spatial claims with other societal infrastructures, disturbing the sustainable situation. The objective of this paper is to design large infrastructures, with a focus on the Drinking Water Infrastructure (DWI), in a more sustainable way by using the resilience concept. To study this, a case study was done in the Netherlands, where an overlap is present between the DWI and the protection zones, and a new railroad and water safety measures in the river IJssel. The case showed that conflicting infrastructures are inflexible and unable to adapt to change due to several reasons in the governance and in the infrastructure system itself. The case was useful for identifying eight design principles to prevent conflicting claims between large infrastructures.
topic societal infrastructures
sustainability
conflicting spatial claims
design principles
drinking water protection zones
groundwater
ijssel
zwolle
railroad
governance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/785
work_keys_str_mv AT ritscheannekloosterman sustainablesocietalinfrastructuresaresilientapproachtopreventconflictingclaimsofdrinkingwaterandotherinfrastructures
AT wijnandveeneman sustainablesocietalinfrastructuresaresilientapproachtopreventconflictingclaimsofdrinkingwaterandotherinfrastructures
AT janpetervanderhoek sustainablesocietalinfrastructuresaresilientapproachtopreventconflictingclaimsofdrinkingwaterandotherinfrastructures
_version_ 1724937291524210688