Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.

The spread of economic shocks in an increasingly interconnected global economy has been subject to several studies recently. These studies mostly focus on the synchronization of business cycles among economies and search for the relationship between trade linkages and shock contagion. In contrast to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamás Sebestyén, Zita Iloskics
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238626
id doaj-0147990afda04bcba7add06a13c53c0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0147990afda04bcba7add06a13c53c0d2021-03-03T22:04:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023862610.1371/journal.pone.0238626Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.Tamás SebestyénZita IloskicsThe spread of economic shocks in an increasingly interconnected global economy has been subject to several studies recently. These studies mostly focus on the synchronization of business cycles among economies and search for the relationship between trade linkages and shock contagion. In contrast to previous studies in the field, this paper focuses on the topological properties of the shock contagion network as measured by pairwise Granger causality between economic output of countries. This topological approach can bring new insights into the dynamics of contagion and the relationship between trade and cycle synchronization while also allows to test the patterns of shock contagion against randomness. Results show that connectedness decreases over the previous decades until the first decade of the 21st century, showing less frequent shock transmission which shades previous results in the field which typically associate increasing trade and globalization with more frequent or unchanged contagion. We find significant non-random topology with respect to transitivity and path lengths, the skewness of the degree distribution and the stability of connections. Estimations show that there is a systematically existing (persistent) contagion path in 16% of all possible connections. However, we do not find significant geographical or development-wise patterns behind the modularity of the contagion network and no significant association is found between economic openness and exposure to shock transmission in either direction.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238626
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamás Sebestyén
Zita Iloskics
spellingShingle Tamás Sebestyén
Zita Iloskics
Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Tamás Sebestyén
Zita Iloskics
author_sort Tamás Sebestyén
title Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
title_short Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
title_full Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
title_fullStr Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
title_full_unstemmed Do economic shocks spread randomly?: A topological study of the global contagion network.
title_sort do economic shocks spread randomly?: a topological study of the global contagion network.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The spread of economic shocks in an increasingly interconnected global economy has been subject to several studies recently. These studies mostly focus on the synchronization of business cycles among economies and search for the relationship between trade linkages and shock contagion. In contrast to previous studies in the field, this paper focuses on the topological properties of the shock contagion network as measured by pairwise Granger causality between economic output of countries. This topological approach can bring new insights into the dynamics of contagion and the relationship between trade and cycle synchronization while also allows to test the patterns of shock contagion against randomness. Results show that connectedness decreases over the previous decades until the first decade of the 21st century, showing less frequent shock transmission which shades previous results in the field which typically associate increasing trade and globalization with more frequent or unchanged contagion. We find significant non-random topology with respect to transitivity and path lengths, the skewness of the degree distribution and the stability of connections. Estimations show that there is a systematically existing (persistent) contagion path in 16% of all possible connections. However, we do not find significant geographical or development-wise patterns behind the modularity of the contagion network and no significant association is found between economic openness and exposure to shock transmission in either direction.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238626
work_keys_str_mv AT tamassebestyen doeconomicshocksspreadrandomlyatopologicalstudyoftheglobalcontagionnetwork
AT zitailoskics doeconomicshocksspreadrandomlyatopologicalstudyoftheglobalcontagionnetwork
_version_ 1714813537106264064