Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the distributions of measurements of the Dutch Fatigue Scale (DUFS), Dutch Exertion Fatigue Scale (DEFS), and Fatigue Pictogram tools, according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Method:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eliane Nepomuceno, Luma Nascimento Silva, Débora Cristine Prévide da Cunha, Rejane Kiomi Furuya, Marcus Vinicius Simões, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
Series:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000902404&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-0141ab2020ef42768b6a0d36fa39bb19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0141ab2020ef42768b6a0d36fa39bb192020-11-25T01:45:15ZengAssociação Brasileira de EnfermagemRevista Brasileira de Enfermagem1984-04462404241010.1590/0034-7167-2017-0083S0034-71672018000902404Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failureEliane NepomucenoLuma Nascimento SilvaDébora Cristine Prévide da CunhaRejane Kiomi FuruyaMarcus Vinicius SimõesRosana Aparecida Spadoti DantasABSTRACT Objective: To compare the distributions of measurements of the Dutch Fatigue Scale (DUFS), Dutch Exertion Fatigue Scale (DEFS), and Fatigue Pictogram tools, according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Method: Methodological, cross-sectional study with 118 patients with heart failure. Variance analysis, Pearson's correlation, and Fisher's exact tests were carried out, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was an increase in the DUFS and DEFS means with worsening of the NYHA-FC (p<0.001, for both tools). Correlations among the LVEF resulted in positive and weak magnitude for the DEFS (r=0.18; p=0.05) and for the DUFS (r=0.16; p=0.08). Just the item A on the Fatigue Pictogram had an association with the NYHA-FC (p<0.001) and the LVEF (p=0.03). Conclusion: Three tools detected worsening in fatigue levels according to the illness severity assessed by the NYHA-FC.http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000902404&lng=en&tlng=enHeart FailureCardiovascular NursingFatigueSurveys and QuestionnairesNursing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eliane Nepomuceno
Luma Nascimento Silva
Débora Cristine Prévide da Cunha
Rejane Kiomi Furuya
Marcus Vinicius Simões
Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas
spellingShingle Eliane Nepomuceno
Luma Nascimento Silva
Débora Cristine Prévide da Cunha
Rejane Kiomi Furuya
Marcus Vinicius Simões
Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas
Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Heart Failure
Cardiovascular Nursing
Fatigue
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nursing
author_facet Eliane Nepomuceno
Luma Nascimento Silva
Débora Cristine Prévide da Cunha
Rejane Kiomi Furuya
Marcus Vinicius Simões
Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas
author_sort Eliane Nepomuceno
title Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
title_short Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
title_full Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
title_fullStr Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
title_sort comparison of tools for assessing fatigue in patients with heart failure
publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
series Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
issn 1984-0446
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the distributions of measurements of the Dutch Fatigue Scale (DUFS), Dutch Exertion Fatigue Scale (DEFS), and Fatigue Pictogram tools, according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Method: Methodological, cross-sectional study with 118 patients with heart failure. Variance analysis, Pearson's correlation, and Fisher's exact tests were carried out, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was an increase in the DUFS and DEFS means with worsening of the NYHA-FC (p<0.001, for both tools). Correlations among the LVEF resulted in positive and weak magnitude for the DEFS (r=0.18; p=0.05) and for the DUFS (r=0.16; p=0.08). Just the item A on the Fatigue Pictogram had an association with the NYHA-FC (p<0.001) and the LVEF (p=0.03). Conclusion: Three tools detected worsening in fatigue levels according to the illness severity assessed by the NYHA-FC.
topic Heart Failure
Cardiovascular Nursing
Fatigue
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nursing
url http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000902404&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT elianenepomuceno comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
AT lumanascimentosilva comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
AT deboracristineprevidedacunha comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
AT rejanekiomifuruya comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
AT marcusviniciussimoes comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
AT rosanaaparecidaspadotidantas comparisonoftoolsforassessingfatigueinpatientswithheartfailure
_version_ 1725024052119076864