“Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia

This paper explores the ideological context of rural development in Sabah, Malaysia. Drawing on ethnographic data of state practices and discourse, and local reactions to state policies, I discuss events surrounding a rural development initiative. I conclude that development in Sabah serves as the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amity A. Doolittle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Provence 2001-12-01
Series:Moussons
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/3454
id doaj-0140b8e0842345e389c985ab99631a7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0140b8e0842345e389c985ab99631a7b2020-11-24T21:28:13ZengUniversité de ProvenceMoussons1620-32242262-83632001-12-014759510.4000/moussons.3454“Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, MalaysiaAmity A. DoolittleThis paper explores the ideological context of rural development in Sabah, Malaysia. Drawing on ethnographic data of state practices and discourse, and local reactions to state policies, I discuss events surrounding a rural development initiative. I conclude that development in Sabah serves as the primary point of entry for the federal government into village politics. Thus, if development does not necessarily raise the local standard of living, it facilitates the expansion and entrenchment of the ruling elite – the United Malaysia National Organization (UMNO). In effect, development serves to consolidate the power of the Malay-Muslim elite over Sabah’s indigenous population and promote the government’s ideological commitment to a nation united by “one language, one culture, and one religion.” Building on Ferguson’s radical critique of development, I look for the instrument-effects of development that occur behind the rhetoric of poverty alleviation. Contrary to Ferguson, however, I argue that, in the context of development in Malaysia, these instrument-effects are not unintended. Instead, development is knowingly deployed by state representatives to expand bureaucratic power. Furthermore, villagers are able to demystify the rhetoric of development and are aware that access to development funds is contingent on their support of UMNO political candidates.http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/3454rural developmentdevelopment politicsdevelopment discourseSabahMalaysiacolonial history
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amity A. Doolittle
spellingShingle Amity A. Doolittle
“Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
Moussons
rural development
development politics
development discourse
Sabah
Malaysia
colonial history
author_facet Amity A. Doolittle
author_sort Amity A. Doolittle
title “Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
title_short “Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
title_full “Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
title_fullStr “Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed “Are They Making Fun of Us?” The Politics of Development in Sabah, Malaysia
title_sort “are they making fun of us?” the politics of development in sabah, malaysia
publisher Université de Provence
series Moussons
issn 1620-3224
2262-8363
publishDate 2001-12-01
description This paper explores the ideological context of rural development in Sabah, Malaysia. Drawing on ethnographic data of state practices and discourse, and local reactions to state policies, I discuss events surrounding a rural development initiative. I conclude that development in Sabah serves as the primary point of entry for the federal government into village politics. Thus, if development does not necessarily raise the local standard of living, it facilitates the expansion and entrenchment of the ruling elite – the United Malaysia National Organization (UMNO). In effect, development serves to consolidate the power of the Malay-Muslim elite over Sabah’s indigenous population and promote the government’s ideological commitment to a nation united by “one language, one culture, and one religion.” Building on Ferguson’s radical critique of development, I look for the instrument-effects of development that occur behind the rhetoric of poverty alleviation. Contrary to Ferguson, however, I argue that, in the context of development in Malaysia, these instrument-effects are not unintended. Instead, development is knowingly deployed by state representatives to expand bureaucratic power. Furthermore, villagers are able to demystify the rhetoric of development and are aware that access to development funds is contingent on their support of UMNO political candidates.
topic rural development
development politics
development discourse
Sabah
Malaysia
colonial history
url http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/3454
work_keys_str_mv AT amityadoolittle aretheymakingfunofusthepoliticsofdevelopmentinsabahmalaysia
_version_ 1725971621254004736