Biosafety of a 3D-printed intraocular lens made of a poly(acrylamide-co-sodium acrylate) hydrogel in vitro and in vivo

• Main Authors: Jia-Wen Li, Yi-Jian Li, Xi-Su Hu, Yu Gong, Ben-Bin Xu, Hai-Wei Xu, Zheng-Qin Yin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2020-10-01
• Series: International Journal of Ophthalmology
• Subjects: cataract; biosafety; lens epithelial cells; arpe19 cells; intraocular lens; 3d printing; poly hydrogel; rabbit
• Online Access: http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2020/10/20201003.pdf
• ISSN: 2222-3959; 2227-4898

AIM: To assess the biosafety of a poly(acrylamide-co-sodium acrylate) hydrogel (PAH) as a 3D-printed intraocular lens (IOL) material. METHODS: The biosafety of PAH was first evaluated in vitro using human lens epithelial cells (LECs) and the ARPE19 cell line, and a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was performed to investigate alterations in cell proliferation. A thin film of PAH and a conventional IOL were intraocularly implanted into the eyes of New Zealand white rabbits respectively, and a sham surgery served as control group. The anterior segment photographs, intraocular pressure (IOP), blood parameters and electroretinograms (ERG) were recorded. Inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor, such as TNFα and IL-8, were examined by ELISA. Cell apoptosis of the retina was investigated by TUNEL assay, and macroPAHge activation was detected by immunostaining. RESULTS: PAH did not slow cell proliferation when cocultured with human LECs or ARPE19 cells. The implantation of a thin film of a 3D-printed IOL composed of PAH did not affect the IOP, blood parameters, ERG or optical structure in any of the three experimental groups (n=3 for each). Both TNFα and IL-8 in the aqueous humor of PAH group were transiently elevated 1wk post-operation and recovered to normal levels at 1 and 3mo post-operation. Iba1+ macroPAHges in the anterior chamber angle in PAH group were increased markedly compared to those of the control group; however, there was no significant difference compared to those in the IOL group. CONCLUSION: PAH is a safe material for 3D printing of personal IOLs that hold great potential for future clinical applications.