Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos

This paper analyses the potential effect of multiple item scales’ number of points on the descriptive results and psychometric characteristics. A literature review was carried, followed by a field survey. The data were collected by means of 3 structured questionnaires to measure management student’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza, Carvalho, Diana Lúcia Teixeira de, Soares Neto, João Batista, Costa, Francisco José da
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal da Paraíba 2013-12-01
Series:Teoria e Prática em Administração
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/tpa/article/view/15413/9935
id doaj-0138a68c9ea349188e1a9a1224030ca9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0138a68c9ea349188e1a9a1224030ca92020-11-24T22:46:53ZengUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaTeoria e Prática em Administração2238-104X2238-104X2013-12-013299120Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontosBarboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza0Carvalho, Diana Lúcia Teixeira de 1Soares Neto, João Batista 2Costa, Francisco José da3Universidade Federal da Paraíba – BrasilUniversidade Federal da Paraíba – BrasilUniversidade Federal da Paraíba – BrasilUniversidade Federal da Paraíba – BrasilThis paper analyses the potential effect of multiple item scales’ number of points on the descriptive results and psychometric characteristics. A literature review was carried, followed by a field survey. The data were collected by means of 3 structured questionnaires to measure management student’s perception of profession reputation and personal identification. The metrics were adapted for scales of 5 (1 to 5), 7 (1 to 7) e 11 (0 to 10) points. The total sample had 285 respondents, and the procedures of analysis involved descriptive statistics and reliability analysis. The results indicated significant differences, although small ones, in the descriptive measures, on the other hand, the psychometric analyses had no variation related to the number of scale points. The main conclusion is that the use of scale with the 3 number of points can generate good results for researches; thus, the researcher may decide which scale use, considering the study’s needs and the sample characteristics.http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/tpa/article/view/15413/9935MeasurementScalesNumber of pointsQuantitative Research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza
Carvalho, Diana Lúcia Teixeira de
Soares Neto, João Batista
Costa, Francisco José da
spellingShingle Barboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza
Carvalho, Diana Lúcia Teixeira de
Soares Neto, João Batista
Costa, Francisco José da
Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
Teoria e Prática em Administração
Measurement
Scales
Number of points
Quantitative Research
author_facet Barboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza
Carvalho, Diana Lúcia Teixeira de
Soares Neto, João Batista
Costa, Francisco José da
author_sort Barboza, Stephanie Ingrid Souza
title Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
title_short Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
title_full Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
title_fullStr Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
title_full_unstemmed Variações de Mensuração pela Escala de Verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
title_sort variações de mensuração pela escala de verificação: uma análise com escalas de 5, 7 e 11 pontos
publisher Universidade Federal da Paraíba
series Teoria e Prática em Administração
issn 2238-104X
2238-104X
publishDate 2013-12-01
description This paper analyses the potential effect of multiple item scales’ number of points on the descriptive results and psychometric characteristics. A literature review was carried, followed by a field survey. The data were collected by means of 3 structured questionnaires to measure management student’s perception of profession reputation and personal identification. The metrics were adapted for scales of 5 (1 to 5), 7 (1 to 7) e 11 (0 to 10) points. The total sample had 285 respondents, and the procedures of analysis involved descriptive statistics and reliability analysis. The results indicated significant differences, although small ones, in the descriptive measures, on the other hand, the psychometric analyses had no variation related to the number of scale points. The main conclusion is that the use of scale with the 3 number of points can generate good results for researches; thus, the researcher may decide which scale use, considering the study’s needs and the sample characteristics.
topic Measurement
Scales
Number of points
Quantitative Research
url http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/tpa/article/view/15413/9935
work_keys_str_mv AT barbozastephanieingridsouza variacoesdemensuracaopelaescaladeverificacaoumaanalisecomescalasde57e11pontos
AT carvalhodianaluciateixeirade variacoesdemensuracaopelaescaladeverificacaoumaanalisecomescalasde57e11pontos
AT soaresnetojoaobatista variacoesdemensuracaopelaescaladeverificacaoumaanalisecomescalasde57e11pontos
AT costafranciscojoseda variacoesdemensuracaopelaescaladeverificacaoumaanalisecomescalasde57e11pontos
_version_ 1725683302784827392