Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials
The use of the Boehm titration (BT) method as an analytical tool for the quantification of oxygen-containing surface groups is systematically investigated for oxidized carbon black, carbon nanotubes and two active carbons with specific surface areas between 60 and 1750 m2 g−1. The accuracy of the BT...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-04-01
|
Series: | C |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/4/2/22 |
id |
doaj-0135927bd415435f916543088bf6a89c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0135927bd415435f916543088bf6a89c2020-11-24T21:06:02ZengMDPI AGC2311-56292018-04-01422210.3390/c4020022c4020022Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon MaterialsJan Schönherr0Johannes R. Buchheim1Peter Scholz2Philipp Adelhelm3Institute for Technical Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC Jena), Friedrich Schiller University, Philosophenweg 7a, 07743 Jena, GermanyInstitute for Technical Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC Jena), Friedrich Schiller University, Philosophenweg 7a, 07743 Jena, GermanyInstitute for Technical Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC Jena), Friedrich Schiller University, Philosophenweg 7a, 07743 Jena, GermanyInstitute for Technical Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC Jena), Friedrich Schiller University, Philosophenweg 7a, 07743 Jena, GermanyThe use of the Boehm titration (BT) method as an analytical tool for the quantification of oxygen-containing surface groups is systematically investigated for oxidized carbon black, carbon nanotubes and two active carbons with specific surface areas between 60 and 1750 m2 g−1. The accuracy of the BT method is quantitatively compared with results from elemental analysis (EA), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Overall, the results from TPD are in line with the values obtained by BT. Both show the equal ratio of the oxygen groups to each other. Within the series of carbon samples, all methods provide similar trends for the total oxygen content yet the absolute numbers are deviating significantly. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed and linked to the specific characteristics of the different methods. As the BT method is a solution based method, it only probes the surface fraction of the carbon that is accessible to the base solution. That means, it probes the relevant fraction for applications where carbon is in contact to aqueous solutions. Overall, the BT method can be conveniently applied to a broad range of carbon materials as long as the samples are sufficiently hydrophilic and of the enough sample amount is provided.http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/4/2/22carbon materialsBoehm titrationquantitative analysisoxygen-containing groupsvalidation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan Schönherr Johannes R. Buchheim Peter Scholz Philipp Adelhelm |
spellingShingle |
Jan Schönherr Johannes R. Buchheim Peter Scholz Philipp Adelhelm Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials C carbon materials Boehm titration quantitative analysis oxygen-containing groups validation |
author_facet |
Jan Schönherr Johannes R. Buchheim Peter Scholz Philipp Adelhelm |
author_sort |
Jan Schönherr |
title |
Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials |
title_short |
Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials |
title_full |
Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials |
title_fullStr |
Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Boehm Titration Revisited (Part II): A Comparison of Boehm Titration with Other Analytical Techniques on the Quantification of Oxygen-Containing Surface Groups for a Variety of Carbon Materials |
title_sort |
boehm titration revisited (part ii): a comparison of boehm titration with other analytical techniques on the quantification of oxygen-containing surface groups for a variety of carbon materials |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
C |
issn |
2311-5629 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
The use of the Boehm titration (BT) method as an analytical tool for the quantification of oxygen-containing surface groups is systematically investigated for oxidized carbon black, carbon nanotubes and two active carbons with specific surface areas between 60 and 1750 m2 g−1. The accuracy of the BT method is quantitatively compared with results from elemental analysis (EA), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Overall, the results from TPD are in line with the values obtained by BT. Both show the equal ratio of the oxygen groups to each other. Within the series of carbon samples, all methods provide similar trends for the total oxygen content yet the absolute numbers are deviating significantly. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed and linked to the specific characteristics of the different methods. As the BT method is a solution based method, it only probes the surface fraction of the carbon that is accessible to the base solution. That means, it probes the relevant fraction for applications where carbon is in contact to aqueous solutions. Overall, the BT method can be conveniently applied to a broad range of carbon materials as long as the samples are sufficiently hydrophilic and of the enough sample amount is provided. |
topic |
carbon materials Boehm titration quantitative analysis oxygen-containing groups validation |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/4/2/22 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janschonherr boehmtitrationrevisitedpartiiacomparisonofboehmtitrationwithotheranalyticaltechniquesonthequantificationofoxygencontainingsurfacegroupsforavarietyofcarbonmaterials AT johannesrbuchheim boehmtitrationrevisitedpartiiacomparisonofboehmtitrationwithotheranalyticaltechniquesonthequantificationofoxygencontainingsurfacegroupsforavarietyofcarbonmaterials AT peterscholz boehmtitrationrevisitedpartiiacomparisonofboehmtitrationwithotheranalyticaltechniquesonthequantificationofoxygencontainingsurfacegroupsforavarietyofcarbonmaterials AT philippadelhelm boehmtitrationrevisitedpartiiacomparisonofboehmtitrationwithotheranalyticaltechniquesonthequantificationofoxygencontainingsurfacegroupsforavarietyofcarbonmaterials |
_version_ |
1716766975853592576 |