Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research

Financial conflicts of interest, several cases of scientific fraud, and research limitations from strong intellectual property laws have all led to questioning the epistemic and social justice appropriateness of industry-funded research. At first sight, the ideal of Open Science, which promotes tran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manuela Fernández Pinto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2020.588331/full
id doaj-012768c61ddf474da216d2b5b82e0824
record_format Article
spelling doaj-012768c61ddf474da216d2b5b82e08242021-06-02T15:51:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics2504-05372020-11-01510.3389/frma.2020.588331588331Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of ResearchManuela Fernández PintoFinancial conflicts of interest, several cases of scientific fraud, and research limitations from strong intellectual property laws have all led to questioning the epistemic and social justice appropriateness of industry-funded research. At first sight, the ideal of Open Science, which promotes transparency, sharing, collaboration, and accountability, seems to target precisely the type of limitations uncovered in commercially-driven research. The Open Science movement, however, has primarily focused on publicly funded research, has actively encouraged liaisons with the private sector, and has also created new strategies for commercializing science. As a consequence, I argue that Open Science ends up contributing to the commercialization of science, instead of overcoming its limitations. I use the examples of research publications and citizen science to illustrate this point. Accordingly, the asymmetry between private and public science, present in the current plea to open science, ends up compromising the values of transparency, democracy, and accountability.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2020.588331/fullcommercialization of scienceopen Scienceopen accessindustry-funded researchdemocratization of science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuela Fernández Pinto
spellingShingle Manuela Fernández Pinto
Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
commercialization of science
open Science
open access
industry-funded research
democratization of science
author_facet Manuela Fernández Pinto
author_sort Manuela Fernández Pinto
title Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
title_short Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
title_full Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
title_fullStr Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
title_full_unstemmed Open Science for private Interests? How the Logic of Open Science Contributes to the Commercialization of Research
title_sort open science for private interests? how the logic of open science contributes to the commercialization of research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
issn 2504-0537
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Financial conflicts of interest, several cases of scientific fraud, and research limitations from strong intellectual property laws have all led to questioning the epistemic and social justice appropriateness of industry-funded research. At first sight, the ideal of Open Science, which promotes transparency, sharing, collaboration, and accountability, seems to target precisely the type of limitations uncovered in commercially-driven research. The Open Science movement, however, has primarily focused on publicly funded research, has actively encouraged liaisons with the private sector, and has also created new strategies for commercializing science. As a consequence, I argue that Open Science ends up contributing to the commercialization of science, instead of overcoming its limitations. I use the examples of research publications and citizen science to illustrate this point. Accordingly, the asymmetry between private and public science, present in the current plea to open science, ends up compromising the values of transparency, democracy, and accountability.
topic commercialization of science
open Science
open access
industry-funded research
democratization of science
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2020.588331/full
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelafernandezpinto openscienceforprivateinterestshowthelogicofopensciencecontributestothecommercializationofresearch
_version_ 1721402945184989184