Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years;...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/full |
id |
doaj-0105bd9110bb4fa2ad8e1fbae450df17 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0105bd9110bb4fa2ad8e1fbae450df172020-11-24T21:05:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-04-011010.3389/fphys.2019.00506440429Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail RunningGlenn Björklund0Glenn Björklund1Mikael Swarén2Dennis-Peter Born3Thomas Stöggl4Department of Health Sciences, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, SwedenThe Swedish Sports Confederation, Stockholm, SwedenRoyal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment for Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, SwitzerlandDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaOur aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine V˙O2 max, running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative V˙O2 max (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. V˙O2 max, vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/fulldownhill runningfoot forcesground contact timepacingstride frequency |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Glenn Björklund Glenn Björklund Mikael Swarén Dennis-Peter Born Thomas Stöggl |
spellingShingle |
Glenn Björklund Glenn Björklund Mikael Swarén Dennis-Peter Born Thomas Stöggl Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running Frontiers in Physiology downhill running foot forces ground contact time pacing stride frequency |
author_facet |
Glenn Björklund Glenn Björklund Mikael Swarén Dennis-Peter Born Thomas Stöggl |
author_sort |
Glenn Björklund |
title |
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_short |
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_full |
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_sort |
biomechanical adaptations and performance indicators in short trail running |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physiology |
issn |
1664-042X |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine V˙O2 max, running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative V˙O2 max (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. V˙O2 max, vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics. |
topic |
downhill running foot forces ground contact time pacing stride frequency |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT glennbjorklund biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT glennbjorklund biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT mikaelswaren biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT dennispeterborn biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT thomasstoggl biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning |
_version_ |
1716768009731702784 |