Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running

Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glenn Björklund, Mikael Swarén, Dennis-Peter Born, Thomas Stöggl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/full
id doaj-0105bd9110bb4fa2ad8e1fbae450df17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0105bd9110bb4fa2ad8e1fbae450df172020-11-24T21:05:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-04-011010.3389/fphys.2019.00506440429Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail RunningGlenn Björklund0Glenn Björklund1Mikael Swarén2Dennis-Peter Born3Thomas Stöggl4Department of Health Sciences, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, SwedenThe Swedish Sports Confederation, Stockholm, SwedenRoyal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment for Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, SwitzerlandDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaOur aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine V˙O2 max, running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative V˙O2 max (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. V˙O2 max, vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/fulldownhill runningfoot forcesground contact timepacingstride frequency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Glenn Björklund
Glenn Björklund
Mikael Swarén
Dennis-Peter Born
Thomas Stöggl
spellingShingle Glenn Björklund
Glenn Björklund
Mikael Swarén
Dennis-Peter Born
Thomas Stöggl
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
Frontiers in Physiology
downhill running
foot forces
ground contact time
pacing
stride frequency
author_facet Glenn Björklund
Glenn Björklund
Mikael Swarén
Dennis-Peter Born
Thomas Stöggl
author_sort Glenn Björklund
title Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_short Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_full Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_fullStr Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_sort biomechanical adaptations and performance indicators in short trail running
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake (V˙O2) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine V˙O2 max, running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative V˙O2 max (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. V˙O2 max, vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics.
topic downhill running
foot forces
ground contact time
pacing
stride frequency
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506/full
work_keys_str_mv AT glennbjorklund biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT glennbjorklund biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT mikaelswaren biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT dennispeterborn biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT thomasstoggl biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
_version_ 1716768009731702784