Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load

Abstract Background We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. Methods This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a cros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Swinton, Alasdair R. Corfield, Chris Moultrie, David Percival, Jeffrey Proctor, Neil Sinclair, Zane B. Perkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-09-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3
id doaj-00fa5bc675364819b35cf58af42d5f77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00fa5bc675364819b35cf58af42d5f772020-11-25T02:42:48ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412018-09-0126111010.1186/s13049-018-0549-3Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive loadPaul Swinton0Alasdair R. Corfield1Chris Moultrie2David Percival3Jeffrey Proctor4Neil Sinclair5Zane B. Perkins6Emergency Medical Retrieval Service, ScotSTAR, Scottish Ambulance ServiceRoyal Alexandra HospitalRoyal Alexandra HospitalEmergency Medical Retrieval Service, ScotSTAR, Scottish Ambulance ServiceEmergency Medical Retrieval Service, ScotSTAR, Scottish Ambulance ServiceScottish Ambulance Service, Clinical DirectorateCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary, University of LondonAbstract Background We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. Methods This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a crossover design. Clinical teams (physician and paramedic) from the Emergency Medical Retrieval Service and the Scottish Air Ambulance Division were randomised to perform a standardised pre-hospital clinical simulation using either unprepared (standard practice) or pre-prepared (experimental method) PHEA equipment and drugs. Following a two-week washout period, each team performed the corresponding simulation. The primary outcome was intervention time. Secondary outcomes were safety-related incidents and errors, and degree of cognitive load. Results In total 23 experiments were completed, 12 using experimental method and 11 using standard practice. Time required to perform PHEA using the experimental method was significantly shorter than with standard practice (11,45 versus 20:59) minutes: seconds; p = < 0.001). The experimental method also significantly reduced procedural errors (0 versus 9, p = 0.007) and the cognitive load experienced by the intubator assistant (41.9 versus 68.7 mm, p = 0.006). Conclusions Pre-preparation of PHEA equipment and drugs resulted in safer performance of PHEA and has the potential to reduce on-scene time by up to a third.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3AirwayIntubationEmergencyPatient safety / safetyHuman errorDrug preparation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Swinton
Alasdair R. Corfield
Chris Moultrie
David Percival
Jeffrey Proctor
Neil Sinclair
Zane B. Perkins
spellingShingle Paul Swinton
Alasdair R. Corfield
Chris Moultrie
David Percival
Jeffrey Proctor
Neil Sinclair
Zane B. Perkins
Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Airway
Intubation
Emergency
Patient safety / safety
Human error
Drug preparation
author_facet Paul Swinton
Alasdair R. Corfield
Chris Moultrie
David Percival
Jeffrey Proctor
Neil Sinclair
Zane B. Perkins
author_sort Paul Swinton
title Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_short Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_full Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_fullStr Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_full_unstemmed Impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
title_sort impact of drug and equipment preparation on pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (phea) procedural time, error rate and cognitive load
publisher BMC
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
issn 1757-7241
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Background We examined the effect of advanced preparation and organisation of equipment and drugs for Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) and tracheal intubation on procedural time, error rates, and cognitive load. Methods This study was a randomised, controlled experiment with a crossover design. Clinical teams (physician and paramedic) from the Emergency Medical Retrieval Service and the Scottish Air Ambulance Division were randomised to perform a standardised pre-hospital clinical simulation using either unprepared (standard practice) or pre-prepared (experimental method) PHEA equipment and drugs. Following a two-week washout period, each team performed the corresponding simulation. The primary outcome was intervention time. Secondary outcomes were safety-related incidents and errors, and degree of cognitive load. Results In total 23 experiments were completed, 12 using experimental method and 11 using standard practice. Time required to perform PHEA using the experimental method was significantly shorter than with standard practice (11,45 versus 20:59) minutes: seconds; p = < 0.001). The experimental method also significantly reduced procedural errors (0 versus 9, p = 0.007) and the cognitive load experienced by the intubator assistant (41.9 versus 68.7 mm, p = 0.006). Conclusions Pre-preparation of PHEA equipment and drugs resulted in safer performance of PHEA and has the potential to reduce on-scene time by up to a third.
topic Airway
Intubation
Emergency
Patient safety / safety
Human error
Drug preparation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-018-0549-3
work_keys_str_mv AT paulswinton impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT alasdairrcorfield impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT chrismoultrie impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT davidpercival impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT jeffreyproctor impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT neilsinclair impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
AT zanebperkins impactofdrugandequipmentpreparationonprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiapheaproceduraltimeerrorrateandcognitiveload
_version_ 1724771371457708032