EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of 15% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-S (EDTA with soft soap) preparation for the removal of smear layer at human root surfaces. Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth indicated for extraction due to periodontal disease were sectioned using high speed cylind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Srirangarajan, S Ravindra, S Aparna, S Thakur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2012;volume=16;issue=1;spage=70;epage=73;aulast=Srirangarajan
id doaj-00f64e51f33045dbbf95e518f65e9bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00f64e51f33045dbbf95e518f65e9bb72020-11-24T23:33:36ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X2012-01-01161707310.4103/0972-124X.94608EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agentS SrirangarajanS RavindraS AparnaS ThakurBackground: To evaluate the efficacy of 15% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-S (EDTA with soft soap) preparation for the removal of smear layer at human root surfaces. Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth indicated for extraction due to periodontal disease were sectioned using high speed cylindrical bur under copious irrigation. The root surfaces were instrumented with Gracey 7-8 curette (Hu-Friedy), 12 times to induce an "experimental smear layer". Following root planning, the root surface was cut using diamond disc and separated from the crown. Samples were randomly distributed into five groups. One group was control, saline and test groups were EDTA 15% alone, by active and passive applications (groups 2 and 3), and EDTA 15%+soft soap, by active and passive applications (groups 4 and 5). Specimens were then subjected to scanning electron microscope study. Smear layer removal was evaluated according to Sampaio et al., index. Results: EDTA-S removed the smear layer better than plain EDTA and the control group, while active application of the root conditioning agent had significant difference than the passive application of the agent. Conclusion: EDTA-S has favorable benefits over EDTA alone, and active application is better in comparison with passive application of root conditioning agent. Clinical Relevance: Removal of smear layer has been considered as an important step in periodontal regenerative therapy. Scaling and root planning alone with saline irrigation does not remove the smear layer. EDTA is a commonly used root conditioning agent in periodontal therapy. The addition of a detergent to EDTA proved to remove smear layer more efficiently than EDTA alone.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2012;volume=16;issue=1;spage=70;epage=73;aulast=SrirangarajanEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidperiodontal therapyroot surfacescanning electron microscopesmear layer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S Srirangarajan
S Ravindra
S Aparna
S Thakur
spellingShingle S Srirangarajan
S Ravindra
S Aparna
S Thakur
EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
periodontal therapy
root surface
scanning electron microscope
smear layer
author_facet S Srirangarajan
S Ravindra
S Aparna
S Thakur
author_sort S Srirangarajan
title EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
title_short EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
title_full EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
title_fullStr EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
title_full_unstemmed EDTA-S: A novel root conditioning agent
title_sort edta-s: a novel root conditioning agent
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
issn 0972-124X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: To evaluate the efficacy of 15% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-S (EDTA with soft soap) preparation for the removal of smear layer at human root surfaces. Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth indicated for extraction due to periodontal disease were sectioned using high speed cylindrical bur under copious irrigation. The root surfaces were instrumented with Gracey 7-8 curette (Hu-Friedy), 12 times to induce an "experimental smear layer". Following root planning, the root surface was cut using diamond disc and separated from the crown. Samples were randomly distributed into five groups. One group was control, saline and test groups were EDTA 15% alone, by active and passive applications (groups 2 and 3), and EDTA 15%+soft soap, by active and passive applications (groups 4 and 5). Specimens were then subjected to scanning electron microscope study. Smear layer removal was evaluated according to Sampaio et al., index. Results: EDTA-S removed the smear layer better than plain EDTA and the control group, while active application of the root conditioning agent had significant difference than the passive application of the agent. Conclusion: EDTA-S has favorable benefits over EDTA alone, and active application is better in comparison with passive application of root conditioning agent. Clinical Relevance: Removal of smear layer has been considered as an important step in periodontal regenerative therapy. Scaling and root planning alone with saline irrigation does not remove the smear layer. EDTA is a commonly used root conditioning agent in periodontal therapy. The addition of a detergent to EDTA proved to remove smear layer more efficiently than EDTA alone.
topic Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
periodontal therapy
root surface
scanning electron microscope
smear layer
url http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2012;volume=16;issue=1;spage=70;epage=73;aulast=Srirangarajan
work_keys_str_mv AT ssrirangarajan edtasanovelrootconditioningagent
AT sravindra edtasanovelrootconditioningagent
AT saparna edtasanovelrootconditioningagent
AT sthakur edtasanovelrootconditioningagent
_version_ 1725531288210767872