An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients

Objectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient set...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnes K. Pace, Melanio Bruceta, John Donovan, Sonia J. Vaida, Jill M. Eckert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741
id doaj-00e1736052dc433fa702a90bfea8e97c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00e1736052dc433fa702a90bfea8e97c2021-02-22T00:00:52ZengHindawi LimitedPain Research and Management1918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6695741An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic PatientsAgnes K. Pace0Melanio Bruceta1John Donovan2Sonia J. Vaida3Jill M. Eckert4Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDepartment of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDivision of Pain MedicineObjectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient’s behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient’s subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed. Results. Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse’s and researcher’s CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31–0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2–6) and 6 (4–8)) and postprocedure (1 (0–2) and 3 (0–5)), p<0.001. Discussion. The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agnes K. Pace
Melanio Bruceta
John Donovan
Sonia J. Vaida
Jill M. Eckert
spellingShingle Agnes K. Pace
Melanio Bruceta
John Donovan
Sonia J. Vaida
Jill M. Eckert
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
Pain Research and Management
author_facet Agnes K. Pace
Melanio Bruceta
John Donovan
Sonia J. Vaida
Jill M. Eckert
author_sort Agnes K. Pace
title An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
title_short An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
title_full An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
title_fullStr An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
title_full_unstemmed An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
title_sort objective pain score for chronic pain clinic patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Pain Research and Management
issn 1918-1523
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient’s behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient’s subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed. Results. Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse’s and researcher’s CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31–0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2–6) and 6 (4–8)) and postprocedure (1 (0–2) and 3 (0–5)), p<0.001. Discussion. The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741
work_keys_str_mv AT agneskpace anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT melaniobruceta anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT johndonovan anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT soniajvaida anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT jillmeckert anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT agneskpace objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT melaniobruceta objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT johndonovan objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT soniajvaida objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
AT jillmeckert objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients
_version_ 1714852999189233664