An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients
Objectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient set...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Pain Research and Management |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741 |
id |
doaj-00e1736052dc433fa702a90bfea8e97c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-00e1736052dc433fa702a90bfea8e97c2021-02-22T00:00:52ZengHindawi LimitedPain Research and Management1918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6695741An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic PatientsAgnes K. Pace0Melanio Bruceta1John Donovan2Sonia J. Vaida3Jill M. Eckert4Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDepartment of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative MedicineDivision of Pain MedicineObjectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient’s behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient’s subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed. Results. Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse’s and researcher’s CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31–0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2–6) and 6 (4–8)) and postprocedure (1 (0–2) and 3 (0–5)), p<0.001. Discussion. The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Agnes K. Pace Melanio Bruceta John Donovan Sonia J. Vaida Jill M. Eckert |
spellingShingle |
Agnes K. Pace Melanio Bruceta John Donovan Sonia J. Vaida Jill M. Eckert An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients Pain Research and Management |
author_facet |
Agnes K. Pace Melanio Bruceta John Donovan Sonia J. Vaida Jill M. Eckert |
author_sort |
Agnes K. Pace |
title |
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients |
title_short |
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients |
title_full |
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients |
title_fullStr |
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients |
title_sort |
objective pain score for chronic pain clinic patients |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Pain Research and Management |
issn |
1918-1523 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Objectives. Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient’s behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient’s subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed. Results. Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse’s and researcher’s CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31–0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2–6) and 6 (4–8)) and postprocedure (1 (0–2) and 3 (0–5)), p<0.001. Discussion. The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695741 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT agneskpace anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT melaniobruceta anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT johndonovan anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT soniajvaida anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT jillmeckert anobjectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT agneskpace objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT melaniobruceta objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT johndonovan objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT soniajvaida objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients AT jillmeckert objectivepainscoreforchronicpainclinicpatients |
_version_ |
1714852999189233664 |