Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.

The initial process of identifying words from spoken language and the detection of more subtle regularities underlying their structure are mandatory processes for language acquisition. Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms that allow us to extract these two types of information and their sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth De Diego Balaguer, Juan Manuel Toro, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells, Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2063512?pdf=render
id doaj-00ceb427c5634957af3b404fee4751d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00ceb427c5634957af3b404fee4751d92020-11-25T02:19:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-01-01211e117510.1371/journal.pone.0001175Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.Ruth De Diego BalaguerJuan Manuel ToroAntoni Rodriguez-FornellsAnne-Catherine Bachoud-LéviThe initial process of identifying words from spoken language and the detection of more subtle regularities underlying their structure are mandatory processes for language acquisition. Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms that allow us to extract these two types of information and their specific time-course of acquisition following initial contact with a new language. We report time-related electrophysiological changes that occurred while participants learned an artificial language. These changes strongly correlated with the discovery of the structural rules embedded in the words. These changes were clearly different from those related to word learning and occurred during the first minutes of exposition. There is a functional distinction in the nature of the electrophysiological signals during acquisition: an increase in negativity (N400) in the central electrodes is related to word-learning and development of a frontal positivity (P2) is related to rule-learning. In addition, the results of an online implicit and a post-learning test indicate that, once the rules of the language have been acquired, new words following the rule are processed as words of the language. By contrast, new words violating the rule induce syntax-related electrophysiological responses when inserted online in the stream (an early frontal negativity followed by a late posterior positivity) and clear lexical effects when presented in isolation (N400 modulation). The present study provides direct evidence suggesting that the mechanisms to extract words and structural dependencies from continuous speech are functionally segregated. When these mechanisms are engaged, the electrophysiological marker associated with rule-learning appears very quickly, during the earliest phases of exposition to a new language.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2063512?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ruth De Diego Balaguer
Juan Manuel Toro
Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
spellingShingle Ruth De Diego Balaguer
Juan Manuel Toro
Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ruth De Diego Balaguer
Juan Manuel Toro
Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
author_sort Ruth De Diego Balaguer
title Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
title_short Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
title_full Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
title_fullStr Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
title_full_unstemmed Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
title_sort different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-01-01
description The initial process of identifying words from spoken language and the detection of more subtle regularities underlying their structure are mandatory processes for language acquisition. Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms that allow us to extract these two types of information and their specific time-course of acquisition following initial contact with a new language. We report time-related electrophysiological changes that occurred while participants learned an artificial language. These changes strongly correlated with the discovery of the structural rules embedded in the words. These changes were clearly different from those related to word learning and occurred during the first minutes of exposition. There is a functional distinction in the nature of the electrophysiological signals during acquisition: an increase in negativity (N400) in the central electrodes is related to word-learning and development of a frontal positivity (P2) is related to rule-learning. In addition, the results of an online implicit and a post-learning test indicate that, once the rules of the language have been acquired, new words following the rule are processed as words of the language. By contrast, new words violating the rule induce syntax-related electrophysiological responses when inserted online in the stream (an early frontal negativity followed by a late posterior positivity) and clear lexical effects when presented in isolation (N400 modulation). The present study provides direct evidence suggesting that the mechanisms to extract words and structural dependencies from continuous speech are functionally segregated. When these mechanisms are engaged, the electrophysiological marker associated with rule-learning appears very quickly, during the earliest phases of exposition to a new language.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2063512?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthdediegobalaguer differentneurophysiologicalmechanismsunderlyingwordandruleextractionfromspeech
AT juanmanueltoro differentneurophysiologicalmechanismsunderlyingwordandruleextractionfromspeech
AT antonirodriguezfornells differentneurophysiologicalmechanismsunderlyingwordandruleextractionfromspeech
AT annecatherinebachoudlevi differentneurophysiologicalmechanismsunderlyingwordandruleextractionfromspeech
_version_ 1724874170703020032