Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules
About 70 years ago, in the framework of his theory of chemical bonding, Pauling proposed an empirical correlation between the bond valences (or effective bond orders (BOs)) and the bond lengths. Till now, this simple correlation, basic in the bond valence model (BVM), is widely used in crystal chemi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Molecules |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/2/304 |
id |
doaj-00cd9126faaf4c69ae20a16c94e2a7f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-00cd9126faaf4c69ae20a16c94e2a7f52021-01-09T00:06:33ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492021-01-012630430410.3390/molecules26020304Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s RulesElena Levi0Doron Aurbach1Carlo Gatti2Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, IsraelDepartment of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, IsraelCNR-SCITEC Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche “Giulio Natta”, sezione di via Golgi, via Golgi 19, I-20133 Milano, ItalyAbout 70 years ago, in the framework of his theory of chemical bonding, Pauling proposed an empirical correlation between the bond valences (or effective bond orders (BOs)) and the bond lengths. Till now, this simple correlation, basic in the bond valence model (BVM), is widely used in crystal chemistry, but it was considered irrelevant for metal–metal bonds. An extensive analysis of the quantum chemistry data computed in the last years confirms very well the validity of Pauling’s correlation for both localized and delocalized interactions. This paper briefly summarizes advances in the application of the BVM for compounds with TM–TM bonds (TM = transition metal) and provides further convincing examples. In particular, the BVM model allows for very simple but precise calculations of the effective BOs of the TM–TM interactions. Based on the comparison between formal and effective BOs, we can easily describe steric and electrostatic effects. A possible influence of these effects on materials stability is discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/2/304bond ordermetal–metal bondbond valence sumsteric effectelectrostatic effectmaterial stability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elena Levi Doron Aurbach Carlo Gatti |
spellingShingle |
Elena Levi Doron Aurbach Carlo Gatti Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules Molecules bond order metal–metal bond bond valence sum steric effect electrostatic effect material stability |
author_facet |
Elena Levi Doron Aurbach Carlo Gatti |
author_sort |
Elena Levi |
title |
Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules |
title_short |
Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules |
title_full |
Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules |
title_fullStr |
Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metal–Metal Bond in the Light of Pauling’s Rules |
title_sort |
metal–metal bond in the light of pauling’s rules |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Molecules |
issn |
1420-3049 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
About 70 years ago, in the framework of his theory of chemical bonding, Pauling proposed an empirical correlation between the bond valences (or effective bond orders (BOs)) and the bond lengths. Till now, this simple correlation, basic in the bond valence model (BVM), is widely used in crystal chemistry, but it was considered irrelevant for metal–metal bonds. An extensive analysis of the quantum chemistry data computed in the last years confirms very well the validity of Pauling’s correlation for both localized and delocalized interactions. This paper briefly summarizes advances in the application of the BVM for compounds with TM–TM bonds (TM = transition metal) and provides further convincing examples. In particular, the BVM model allows for very simple but precise calculations of the effective BOs of the TM–TM interactions. Based on the comparison between formal and effective BOs, we can easily describe steric and electrostatic effects. A possible influence of these effects on materials stability is discussed. |
topic |
bond order metal–metal bond bond valence sum steric effect electrostatic effect material stability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/2/304 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elenalevi metalmetalbondinthelightofpaulingsrules AT doronaurbach metalmetalbondinthelightofpaulingsrules AT carlogatti metalmetalbondinthelightofpaulingsrules |
_version_ |
1724344041664937984 |