Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence

Abstract Intergroup violence is assumed to play a key role in establishing and maintaining gang competitive dominance. However, it is not clear how competitive ability, gang size and reciprocal violence interact. Does competitive dominance lead to larger gangs, or allow them to remain small? Does co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Matthew Valasik, George E. Tita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Crime Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-019-0102-3
id doaj-00c091c5c1f648f7b8d1c37cd0dd0f88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00c091c5c1f648f7b8d1c37cd0dd0f882020-11-25T03:34:51ZengBMCCrime Science2193-76802019-08-018112010.1186/s40163-019-0102-3Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violenceP. Jeffrey Brantingham0Matthew Valasik1George E. Tita2Department of Anthropology, University of California Los AngelesDepartment of Sociology, Louisiana State UniversityCriminology, Law and Society, University of California IrvineAbstract Intergroup violence is assumed to play a key role in establishing and maintaining gang competitive dominance. However, it is not clear how competitive ability, gang size and reciprocal violence interact. Does competitive dominance lead to larger gangs, or allow them to remain small? Does competitive dominance lead gangs to mount more attacks against rivals, or expose them to more attacks? We explore a model developed in theoretical ecology to understand communities arranged in strict competitive hierarchies. The model is extended to generate expectations about gang size distributions and the directionality of gang violence. Model expectations are explored with twenty-three years of data on gang homicides from Los Angeles. Gangs may mitigate competitive pressure by quickly finding gaps in the spatial coverage of superior competitors. Competitively superior gangs can be larger or smaller than competitively inferior gangs and a disproportionate source or target of directional violence, depending upon where exactly they fall in the competitive hierarchy. A model specifying the mechanism of competitive dominance is needed to correctly interpret gang size and violence patterns.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-019-0102-3Street gangsTheoretical ecologyMathematical modelingViolent crimeHomicide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Jeffrey Brantingham
Matthew Valasik
George E. Tita
spellingShingle P. Jeffrey Brantingham
Matthew Valasik
George E. Tita
Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
Crime Science
Street gangs
Theoretical ecology
Mathematical modeling
Violent crime
Homicide
author_facet P. Jeffrey Brantingham
Matthew Valasik
George E. Tita
author_sort P. Jeffrey Brantingham
title Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
title_short Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
title_full Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
title_fullStr Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
title_full_unstemmed Competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
title_sort competitive dominance, gang size and the directionality of gang violence
publisher BMC
series Crime Science
issn 2193-7680
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Intergroup violence is assumed to play a key role in establishing and maintaining gang competitive dominance. However, it is not clear how competitive ability, gang size and reciprocal violence interact. Does competitive dominance lead to larger gangs, or allow them to remain small? Does competitive dominance lead gangs to mount more attacks against rivals, or expose them to more attacks? We explore a model developed in theoretical ecology to understand communities arranged in strict competitive hierarchies. The model is extended to generate expectations about gang size distributions and the directionality of gang violence. Model expectations are explored with twenty-three years of data on gang homicides from Los Angeles. Gangs may mitigate competitive pressure by quickly finding gaps in the spatial coverage of superior competitors. Competitively superior gangs can be larger or smaller than competitively inferior gangs and a disproportionate source or target of directional violence, depending upon where exactly they fall in the competitive hierarchy. A model specifying the mechanism of competitive dominance is needed to correctly interpret gang size and violence patterns.
topic Street gangs
Theoretical ecology
Mathematical modeling
Violent crime
Homicide
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-019-0102-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pjeffreybrantingham competitivedominancegangsizeandthedirectionalityofgangviolence
AT matthewvalasik competitivedominancegangsizeandthedirectionalityofgangviolence
AT georgeetita competitivedominancegangsizeandthedirectionalityofgangviolence
_version_ 1724557093949669376