Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging

Christina C Mendat,1 Dave Mislan,2 Lisa Hession-Kunz2 1Human Factors MD, Charlotte, NC, 2Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA Abstract: A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mendat CC, Mislan D, Hession-Kunz L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-05-01
Series:International Journal of Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/patient-comfort-from-the-technologist-perspective-factors-to-consider--peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
id doaj-00bd79249f9d4d12b3530bf34afc6b91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00bd79249f9d4d12b3530bf34afc6b912020-11-24T21:00:41ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Women's Health1179-14112017-05-01Volume 935936432913Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imagingMendat CCMislan DHession-Kunz LChristina C Mendat,1 Dave Mislan,2 Lisa Hession-Kunz2 1Human Factors MD, Charlotte, NC, 2Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA Abstract: A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists’ level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings suggest that according to technologists, multiple factors, including patient ethnicity, breast density, previous biopsy and lumpectomy experience, as well as psychological factors, impact breast discomfort during mammography. Additionally, with respect to imaging protocols, technologists attributed 80% of moderate-to-extreme discomfort to “length of compression time” (27%) and “compression force” (53%). Technologists also attributed “pinching at chest wall” and “hard edges of breast platform” to “very high” discomfort significantly more times (P<0.05) than “coolness and edges of paddle”. These findings confirm some of what has been reported to date and challenge other findings. Given that recent decline in breast cancer mortality has been attributed to improvements in early detection and treatment, approaches to reduce discomfort should be considered in order to promote screening compliance. Although more research is needed, it is apparent that the patient experience of comfort and pain during mammography is an area warranting increased research and solutions. Keywords: mammography, discomfort, pain, density, compliance, breasthttps://www.dovepress.com/patient-comfort-from-the-technologist-perspective-factors-to-consider--peer-reviewed-article-IJWHMammographydiscomfortpaintechnologistcompliancebreast.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mendat CC
Mislan D
Hession-Kunz L
spellingShingle Mendat CC
Mislan D
Hession-Kunz L
Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
International Journal of Women's Health
Mammography
discomfort
pain
technologist
compliance
breast.
author_facet Mendat CC
Mislan D
Hession-Kunz L
author_sort Mendat CC
title Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
title_short Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
title_full Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
title_fullStr Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
title_full_unstemmed Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
title_sort patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
publisher Dove Medical Press
series International Journal of Women's Health
issn 1179-1411
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Christina C Mendat,1 Dave Mislan,2 Lisa Hession-Kunz2 1Human Factors MD, Charlotte, NC, 2Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA Abstract: A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists’ level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings suggest that according to technologists, multiple factors, including patient ethnicity, breast density, previous biopsy and lumpectomy experience, as well as psychological factors, impact breast discomfort during mammography. Additionally, with respect to imaging protocols, technologists attributed 80% of moderate-to-extreme discomfort to “length of compression time” (27%) and “compression force” (53%). Technologists also attributed “pinching at chest wall” and “hard edges of breast platform” to “very high” discomfort significantly more times (P<0.05) than “coolness and edges of paddle”. These findings confirm some of what has been reported to date and challenge other findings. Given that recent decline in breast cancer mortality has been attributed to improvements in early detection and treatment, approaches to reduce discomfort should be considered in order to promote screening compliance. Although more research is needed, it is apparent that the patient experience of comfort and pain during mammography is an area warranting increased research and solutions. Keywords: mammography, discomfort, pain, density, compliance, breast
topic Mammography
discomfort
pain
technologist
compliance
breast.
url https://www.dovepress.com/patient-comfort-from-the-technologist-perspective-factors-to-consider--peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
work_keys_str_mv AT mendatcc patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging
AT misland patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging
AT hessionkunzl patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging
_version_ 1716778958930837504