Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies

Recent work has suggested that media reporting about the public’s policy preferences may be self-reinforcing, contributing to greater policy conformity. This article presents additional evidence in support of this theory and adds new detail about the conditionality of these effects. Results from two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benjamin Toff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-11-01
Series:Research & Politics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018812215
id doaj-00a5c727a7ff40c382ab16350887e185
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00a5c727a7ff40c382ab16350887e1852020-11-25T03:16:19ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802018-11-01510.1177/2053168018812215Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesiesBenjamin ToffRecent work has suggested that media reporting about the public’s policy preferences may be self-reinforcing, contributing to greater policy conformity. This article presents additional evidence in support of this theory and adds new detail about the conditionality of these effects. Results from two experiments are described in which respondents are presented with excerpted news stories containing varying polling information about six separate issues. Findings indicate that (a) exposure to such poll results can elicit differences in support for the issue by as much as 10–15 percentage points; (b) the magnitude of these effects varies systematically and inversely in relation to overall attitudinal intensity levels for each issue; and (c) the opinions of specific subgroups referenced in polls matter, producing larger or smaller effects depending on how salient the group is to receivers of the information. Taken together, these results underscore why news reporting about public attitudes deserves greater attention as an important factor in the policy process.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018812215
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Toff
spellingShingle Benjamin Toff
Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
Research & Politics
author_facet Benjamin Toff
author_sort Benjamin Toff
title Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
title_short Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
title_full Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
title_fullStr Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: How and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
title_sort exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: how and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research & Politics
issn 2053-1680
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Recent work has suggested that media reporting about the public’s policy preferences may be self-reinforcing, contributing to greater policy conformity. This article presents additional evidence in support of this theory and adds new detail about the conditionality of these effects. Results from two experiments are described in which respondents are presented with excerpted news stories containing varying polling information about six separate issues. Findings indicate that (a) exposure to such poll results can elicit differences in support for the issue by as much as 10–15 percentage points; (b) the magnitude of these effects varies systematically and inversely in relation to overall attitudinal intensity levels for each issue; and (c) the opinions of specific subgroups referenced in polls matter, producing larger or smaller effects depending on how salient the group is to receivers of the information. Taken together, these results underscore why news reporting about public attitudes deserves greater attention as an important factor in the policy process.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018812215
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamintoff exploringtheeffectsofpollsonpublicopinionhowandwhenmediareportsofpolicypreferencescanbecomeselffulfillingprophesies
_version_ 1724636968812281856