Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain

Hazel Moore,1 Ian Stewart,1 Dermot Barnes-Holmes,2 Yvonne Barnes-Holmes,2 Brian E McGuire1,31School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 3Centre for Pain Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandB...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moore H, Stewart I, Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, McGuire BE
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-03-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-acceptance-and-distraction-strategies-in-coping-with-exp-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
id doaj-009fa1ff1d624a5483871daeeb126b2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-009fa1ff1d624a5483871daeeb126b2e2020-11-24T22:49:09ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902015-03-012015default13915120896Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced painMoore HStewart IBarnes-Holmes DBarnes-Holmes YMcGuire BE Hazel Moore,1 Ian Stewart,1 Dermot Barnes-Holmes,2 Yvonne Barnes-Holmes,2 Brian E McGuire1,31School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 3Centre for Pain Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandBackground: This study compared an acceptance-based strategy with a control-based strategy (distraction) in terms of the ability of participants to tolerate a painful stimulus, across two experiments. In addition, participants were either actively encouraged, or not, to link pain tolerance with pursuit of valued goals to examine the impact of pursuing a personally meaningful goal or value on the extent to which pain will be tolerated.Methods: Participants in experiment 1 (n=41) and experiment 2 (n=52) were equally assigned to acceptance or distraction protocols. Further, half the participants in each group generated examples from their own lives in which they had pursued a valued objective, while the other half did not. In experiment 2, the values focus was enhanced to examine the impact on pain tolerance.Results: There were no significant differences overall between the acceptance and distraction groups on pain tolerance in either experiment. However, in experiment 2, individuals classified as accepting in terms of general coping style and who were assigned to the acceptance strategy showed significantly better pain tolerance than accepting individuals who were in the distraction condition. Across both experiments, those with strong goal-driven values in both protocols were more tolerant of pain. Participants appeared to have more difficulty adhering to acceptance than to distraction as a strategy.Conclusion: Acceptance may be associated with better tolerance of pain, but may also be more difficult to operationalize than distraction in experimental studies. Matching coping style and coping strategy may be most effective, and enhancement of goal-driven values may assist in pain coping.Keywords: pain, acceptance, values, copinghttp://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-acceptance-and-distraction-strategies-in-coping-with-exp-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moore H
Stewart I
Barnes-Holmes D
Barnes-Holmes Y
McGuire BE
spellingShingle Moore H
Stewart I
Barnes-Holmes D
Barnes-Holmes Y
McGuire BE
Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
Journal of Pain Research
author_facet Moore H
Stewart I
Barnes-Holmes D
Barnes-Holmes Y
McGuire BE
author_sort Moore H
title Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
title_short Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
title_full Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
title_fullStr Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
title_sort comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Pain Research
issn 1178-7090
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Hazel Moore,1 Ian Stewart,1 Dermot Barnes-Holmes,2 Yvonne Barnes-Holmes,2 Brian E McGuire1,31School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 3Centre for Pain Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandBackground: This study compared an acceptance-based strategy with a control-based strategy (distraction) in terms of the ability of participants to tolerate a painful stimulus, across two experiments. In addition, participants were either actively encouraged, or not, to link pain tolerance with pursuit of valued goals to examine the impact of pursuing a personally meaningful goal or value on the extent to which pain will be tolerated.Methods: Participants in experiment 1 (n=41) and experiment 2 (n=52) were equally assigned to acceptance or distraction protocols. Further, half the participants in each group generated examples from their own lives in which they had pursued a valued objective, while the other half did not. In experiment 2, the values focus was enhanced to examine the impact on pain tolerance.Results: There were no significant differences overall between the acceptance and distraction groups on pain tolerance in either experiment. However, in experiment 2, individuals classified as accepting in terms of general coping style and who were assigned to the acceptance strategy showed significantly better pain tolerance than accepting individuals who were in the distraction condition. Across both experiments, those with strong goal-driven values in both protocols were more tolerant of pain. Participants appeared to have more difficulty adhering to acceptance than to distraction as a strategy.Conclusion: Acceptance may be associated with better tolerance of pain, but may also be more difficult to operationalize than distraction in experimental studies. Matching coping style and coping strategy may be most effective, and enhancement of goal-driven values may assist in pain coping.Keywords: pain, acceptance, values, coping
url http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-acceptance-and-distraction-strategies-in-coping-with-exp-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT mooreh comparisonofacceptanceanddistractionstrategiesincopingwithexperimentallyinducedpain
AT stewarti comparisonofacceptanceanddistractionstrategiesincopingwithexperimentallyinducedpain
AT barnesholmesd comparisonofacceptanceanddistractionstrategiesincopingwithexperimentallyinducedpain
AT barnesholmesy comparisonofacceptanceanddistractionstrategiesincopingwithexperimentallyinducedpain
AT mcguirebe comparisonofacceptanceanddistractionstrategiesincopingwithexperimentallyinducedpain
_version_ 1725677012266254336