Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cox Nancy C, Faoagali Joan, Eastburn Matthew, Gaffney Justin, Chang Anne, Masters Ian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-01-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Online Access:http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/3
id doaj-00980b2a961f4ddf920d83dfd0735aa6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-00980b2a961f4ddf920d83dfd0735aa62020-11-24T23:52:30ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-99212005-01-0161310.1186/1465-9921-6-3Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findingsCox Nancy CFaoagali JoanEastburn MatthewGaffney JustinChang AnneMasters Ian<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough quality (wet/dry and brassy/non-brassy) to bronchoscopic findings of secretions and tracheomalacia respectively and, (2) parent's vs clinician's evaluation of the cough quality (wet/dry).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cough quality of children (without a known underlying respiratory disease) undergoing elective bronchoscopy was independently evaluated by clinicians and parents. A 'blinded' clinician scored the secretions seen at bronchoscopy on pre-determined criteria and graded (1 to 6). Kappa (K) statistics was used for agreement, and inter-rater and intra-rater agreement examined on digitally recorded cough. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine if cough quality related to amount of airway secretions present at bronchoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Median age of the 106 children (62 boys, 44 girls) enrolled was 2.6 years (IQR 5.7). Parent's assessment of cough quality (wet/dry) agreed with clinicians' (K = 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.93). When compared to bronchoscopy (bronchoscopic secretion grade 4), clinicians' cough assessment had the highest sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) and were marginally better than parent(s). The area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77–0.92). Intra-observer (K = 1.0) and inter-clinician agreement for wet/dry cough (K = 0.88, 95%CI 0.82–0.94) was very good. Weighted K for inter-rater agreement for bronchoscopic secretion grades was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87–1). Sensitivity and specificity for brassy cough (for tracheomalacia) were 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. K for both intra and inter-observer clinician agreement for brassy cough was 0.79 (95%CI 0.73–0.86).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Dry and wet cough in children, as determined by clinicians and parents has good clinical validity. Clinicians should however be cognisant that children with dry cough may have minimal to mild airway secretions. Brassy cough determined by respiratory physicians is highly specific for tracheomalacia.</p> http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cox Nancy C
Faoagali Joan
Eastburn Matthew
Gaffney Justin
Chang Anne
Masters Ian
spellingShingle Cox Nancy C
Faoagali Joan
Eastburn Matthew
Gaffney Justin
Chang Anne
Masters Ian
Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
Respiratory Research
author_facet Cox Nancy C
Faoagali Joan
Eastburn Matthew
Gaffney Justin
Chang Anne
Masters Ian
author_sort Cox Nancy C
title Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_short Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_full Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_fullStr Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_full_unstemmed Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_sort cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
publisher BMC
series Respiratory Research
issn 1465-9921
publishDate 2005-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough quality (wet/dry and brassy/non-brassy) to bronchoscopic findings of secretions and tracheomalacia respectively and, (2) parent's vs clinician's evaluation of the cough quality (wet/dry).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cough quality of children (without a known underlying respiratory disease) undergoing elective bronchoscopy was independently evaluated by clinicians and parents. A 'blinded' clinician scored the secretions seen at bronchoscopy on pre-determined criteria and graded (1 to 6). Kappa (K) statistics was used for agreement, and inter-rater and intra-rater agreement examined on digitally recorded cough. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine if cough quality related to amount of airway secretions present at bronchoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Median age of the 106 children (62 boys, 44 girls) enrolled was 2.6 years (IQR 5.7). Parent's assessment of cough quality (wet/dry) agreed with clinicians' (K = 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.93). When compared to bronchoscopy (bronchoscopic secretion grade 4), clinicians' cough assessment had the highest sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) and were marginally better than parent(s). The area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77–0.92). Intra-observer (K = 1.0) and inter-clinician agreement for wet/dry cough (K = 0.88, 95%CI 0.82–0.94) was very good. Weighted K for inter-rater agreement for bronchoscopic secretion grades was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87–1). Sensitivity and specificity for brassy cough (for tracheomalacia) were 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. K for both intra and inter-observer clinician agreement for brassy cough was 0.79 (95%CI 0.73–0.86).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Dry and wet cough in children, as determined by clinicians and parents has good clinical validity. Clinicians should however be cognisant that children with dry cough may have minimal to mild airway secretions. Brassy cough determined by respiratory physicians is highly specific for tracheomalacia.</p>
url http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT coxnancyc coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT faoagalijoan coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT eastburnmatthew coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT gaffneyjustin coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT changanne coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT mastersian coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
_version_ 1725473437678305280