Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have shown that fish consumption may modify the risk of ovarian cancer. However, these studies yielded controversial results. The present meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between fish intake and ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: A lit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pei-yue Jiang, Zhong-bo Jiang, Ke-xin Shen, Ying Yue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3986104?pdf=render
id doaj-008b44af30954a83808666bcc159dfe9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-008b44af30954a83808666bcc159dfe92020-11-24T21:44:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9460110.1371/journal.pone.0094601Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.Pei-yue JiangZhong-bo JiangKe-xin ShenYing YueBACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have shown that fish consumption may modify the risk of ovarian cancer. However, these studies yielded controversial results. The present meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between fish intake and ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was carried out using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central database for all relevant studies up to August 2013. We pooled the relative risks (RR) from individual studies using fixed-effect or random-effect model, and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: A total of 15 (ten case-control, and five cohort) studies were included in the present meta-analysis, representing data for 889,033 female subjects and 6,087 ovarian cancer cases. We found that total fish intake was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer among cohort studies (RR = 1.04 95% CI [0.89, 1.22]) as well as case-control studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.73,1.12]). There was no evidence of publication bias as suggested by Begg's test (P = 0.55) and Egger's test(P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that total fish consumption was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. Further analysis on different fish species and food preparation methods should be conducted in future studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3986104?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pei-yue Jiang
Zhong-bo Jiang
Ke-xin Shen
Ying Yue
spellingShingle Pei-yue Jiang
Zhong-bo Jiang
Ke-xin Shen
Ying Yue
Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Pei-yue Jiang
Zhong-bo Jiang
Ke-xin Shen
Ying Yue
author_sort Pei-yue Jiang
title Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
title_short Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
title_full Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
title_fullStr Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
title_full_unstemmed Fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
title_sort fish intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control and cohort studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have shown that fish consumption may modify the risk of ovarian cancer. However, these studies yielded controversial results. The present meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between fish intake and ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was carried out using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central database for all relevant studies up to August 2013. We pooled the relative risks (RR) from individual studies using fixed-effect or random-effect model, and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: A total of 15 (ten case-control, and five cohort) studies were included in the present meta-analysis, representing data for 889,033 female subjects and 6,087 ovarian cancer cases. We found that total fish intake was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer among cohort studies (RR = 1.04 95% CI [0.89, 1.22]) as well as case-control studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.73,1.12]). There was no evidence of publication bias as suggested by Begg's test (P = 0.55) and Egger's test(P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that total fish consumption was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. Further analysis on different fish species and food preparation methods should be conducted in future studies.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3986104?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT peiyuejiang fishintakeandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof15casecontrolandcohortstudies
AT zhongbojiang fishintakeandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof15casecontrolandcohortstudies
AT kexinshen fishintakeandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof15casecontrolandcohortstudies
AT yingyue fishintakeandovariancancerriskametaanalysisof15casecontrolandcohortstudies
_version_ 1725909656493096960