The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries

Abstract Objective – With adoption of the program world-wide, the Learning 2.0 model has been lauded by library professionals as a mechanism to educate library staff and transform libraries. This study, part of the 2009 CAVAL Visiting Scholar project, seeks to measure the impact and legacy of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Stephens, Warren Cheetham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2012-03-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/11728
id doaj-007975a72c07467a923f571299882691
record_format Article
spelling doaj-007975a72c07467a923f5712998826912020-11-24T21:49:00ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2012-03-017110.18438/B8QS4QThe Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public LibrariesMichael Stephens0Warren Cheetham1San Jose State University School of Library and Information ScienceCity Libraries Townsville, Queensland, AustraliaAbstract Objective – With adoption of the program world-wide, the Learning 2.0 model has been lauded by library professionals as a mechanism to educate library staff and transform libraries. This study, part of the 2009 CAVAL Visiting Scholar project, seeks to measure the impact and legacy of the model within Australian public libraries to understand what benefits, changes and effects occur. Methods – A national Web-based survey for those who had participated in a learning 2.0 program. Results – The national survey had 384 respondents, and a total of 64 respondents were identified as the public library staff data set for this article. Public library staff reported success in the program and described feelings of increased confidence, inclusivity, and a move to use emerging technologies as part of library service. Conclusion – The analysis yields the following thematic areas of impact and effect: personal practice is enhanced with knowledge and confidence; impact is mainly personal, but organisational changes may follow; the library is using the tools to varying degrees of success, and organizational blocks prevent use of tools. These finding offer evidence that Learning 2.0 programs can have a positive effect on library staff and subsequently on the organization itself.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/11728learning 2.0public librariesprofessional development programsaustralian libraries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Stephens
Warren Cheetham
spellingShingle Michael Stephens
Warren Cheetham
The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
learning 2.0
public libraries
professional development programs
australian libraries
author_facet Michael Stephens
Warren Cheetham
author_sort Michael Stephens
title The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
title_short The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
title_full The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
title_fullStr The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
title_full_unstemmed The Impact and Effect of Learning 2.0 Programs in Australian Public Libraries
title_sort impact and effect of learning 2.0 programs in australian public libraries
publisher University of Alberta
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
issn 1715-720X
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Abstract Objective – With adoption of the program world-wide, the Learning 2.0 model has been lauded by library professionals as a mechanism to educate library staff and transform libraries. This study, part of the 2009 CAVAL Visiting Scholar project, seeks to measure the impact and legacy of the model within Australian public libraries to understand what benefits, changes and effects occur. Methods – A national Web-based survey for those who had participated in a learning 2.0 program. Results – The national survey had 384 respondents, and a total of 64 respondents were identified as the public library staff data set for this article. Public library staff reported success in the program and described feelings of increased confidence, inclusivity, and a move to use emerging technologies as part of library service. Conclusion – The analysis yields the following thematic areas of impact and effect: personal practice is enhanced with knowledge and confidence; impact is mainly personal, but organisational changes may follow; the library is using the tools to varying degrees of success, and organizational blocks prevent use of tools. These finding offer evidence that Learning 2.0 programs can have a positive effect on library staff and subsequently on the organization itself.
topic learning 2.0
public libraries
professional development programs
australian libraries
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/11728
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelstephens theimpactandeffectoflearning20programsinaustralianpubliclibraries
AT warrencheetham theimpactandeffectoflearning20programsinaustralianpubliclibraries
AT michaelstephens impactandeffectoflearning20programsinaustralianpubliclibraries
AT warrencheetham impactandeffectoflearning20programsinaustralianpubliclibraries
_version_ 1725890042420789248