Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Background The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine au...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-06-01
|
Series: | General Psychiatry |
Online Access: | https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full |
id |
doaj-007163116c5d4263aa0879444d85c699 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-007163116c5d4263aa0879444d85c6992020-11-25T03:00:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupGeneral Psychiatry2517-729X2020-06-0133310.1136/gpsych-2019-100117Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsXiao-Mei Li0Zhan-Ming Shi1Hua Hu2Pei-Jia Wang3Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Psychiatry, Chongqing Jiangbei Mental Health Center, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health and State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health (incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaBackground The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine augmentation of ECT in MDD treatment.Methods Two reviewers searched Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang) and English (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library) databases from their inception to 23 July 2019. The included studies' bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was improved depressive symptoms at day 1 after a single ECT treatment session. Data were pooled to calculate the standardised mean difference and risk ratio with their 95% CIs using RevMan V.5.3. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Four RCTs (n = 239) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol (n = 149) versus propofol alone (n = 90) in patients with MDD who underwent a single ECT session. Three RCTs were considered as unclear risk with respect to random sequence generation using the Cochrane risk of bias. Compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol had greater efficacy in the treatment of depressive symptoms at days 1, 3 and 7 after a single ECT session. Moreover, compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol were significantly associated with increased seizure duration and seizure energy index. Compared with propofol, ketamine alone was significantly associated with increased opening-eye time. Based on the GRADE approach, the evidence level of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from very low (26.7%, 4/15) to ‘low’ (73.3%, 11/15).Conclusion Compared with propofol, there were very low or low evidence levels showing that ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms of patients with MDD undergoing a single ECT session. There is a need for high-quality RCTs.https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xiao-Mei Li Zhan-Ming Shi Hua Hu Pei-Jia Wang |
spellingShingle |
Xiao-Mei Li Zhan-Ming Shi Hua Hu Pei-Jia Wang Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials General Psychiatry |
author_facet |
Xiao-Mei Li Zhan-Ming Shi Hua Hu Pei-Jia Wang |
author_sort |
Xiao-Mei Li |
title |
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short |
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full |
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr |
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort |
effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
General Psychiatry |
issn |
2517-729X |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Background The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine augmentation of ECT in MDD treatment.Methods Two reviewers searched Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang) and English (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library) databases from their inception to 23 July 2019. The included studies' bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was improved depressive symptoms at day 1 after a single ECT treatment session. Data were pooled to calculate the standardised mean difference and risk ratio with their 95% CIs using RevMan V.5.3. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Four RCTs (n = 239) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol (n = 149) versus propofol alone (n = 90) in patients with MDD who underwent a single ECT session. Three RCTs were considered as unclear risk with respect to random sequence generation using the Cochrane risk of bias. Compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol had greater efficacy in the treatment of depressive symptoms at days 1, 3 and 7 after a single ECT session. Moreover, compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol were significantly associated with increased seizure duration and seizure energy index. Compared with propofol, ketamine alone was significantly associated with increased opening-eye time. Based on the GRADE approach, the evidence level of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from very low (26.7%, 4/15) to ‘low’ (73.3%, 11/15).Conclusion Compared with propofol, there were very low or low evidence levels showing that ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms of patients with MDD undergoing a single ECT session. There is a need for high-quality RCTs. |
url |
https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaomeili effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT zhanmingshi effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT huahu effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT peijiawang effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |
_version_ |
1724699036174254080 |