Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Mei Li, Zhan-Ming Shi, Hua Hu, Pei-Jia Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:General Psychiatry
Online Access:https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full
id doaj-007163116c5d4263aa0879444d85c699
record_format Article
spelling doaj-007163116c5d4263aa0879444d85c6992020-11-25T03:00:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupGeneral Psychiatry2517-729X2020-06-0133310.1136/gpsych-2019-100117Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsXiao-Mei Li0Zhan-Ming Shi1Hua Hu2Pei-Jia Wang3Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Psychiatry, Chongqing Jiangbei Mental Health Center, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health and State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health (incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaBackground The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine augmentation of ECT in MDD treatment.Methods Two reviewers searched Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang) and English (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library) databases from their inception to 23 July 2019. The included studies' bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was improved depressive symptoms at day 1 after a single ECT treatment session. Data were pooled to calculate the standardised mean difference and risk ratio with their 95% CIs using RevMan V.5.3. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Four RCTs (n = 239) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol (n = 149) versus propofol alone (n = 90) in patients with MDD who underwent a single ECT session. Three RCTs were considered as unclear risk with respect to random sequence generation using the Cochrane risk of bias. Compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol had greater efficacy in the treatment of depressive symptoms at days 1, 3 and 7 after a single ECT session. Moreover, compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol were significantly associated with increased seizure duration and seizure energy index. Compared with propofol, ketamine alone was significantly associated with increased opening-eye time. Based on the GRADE approach, the evidence level of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from very low (26.7%, 4/15) to ‘low’ (73.3%, 11/15).Conclusion Compared with propofol, there were very low or low evidence levels showing that ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms of patients with MDD undergoing a single ECT session. There is a need for high-quality RCTs.https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiao-Mei Li
Zhan-Ming Shi
Hua Hu
Pei-Jia Wang
spellingShingle Xiao-Mei Li
Zhan-Ming Shi
Hua Hu
Pei-Jia Wang
Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
General Psychiatry
author_facet Xiao-Mei Li
Zhan-Ming Shi
Hua Hu
Pei-Jia Wang
author_sort Xiao-Mei Li
title Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series General Psychiatry
issn 2517-729X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine augmentation of ECT in MDD treatment.Methods Two reviewers searched Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang) and English (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library) databases from their inception to 23 July 2019. The included studies' bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was improved depressive symptoms at day 1 after a single ECT treatment session. Data were pooled to calculate the standardised mean difference and risk ratio with their 95% CIs using RevMan V.5.3. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Four RCTs (n = 239) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol (n = 149) versus propofol alone (n = 90) in patients with MDD who underwent a single ECT session. Three RCTs were considered as unclear risk with respect to random sequence generation using the Cochrane risk of bias. Compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol had greater efficacy in the treatment of depressive symptoms at days 1, 3 and 7 after a single ECT session. Moreover, compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol were significantly associated with increased seizure duration and seizure energy index. Compared with propofol, ketamine alone was significantly associated with increased opening-eye time. Based on the GRADE approach, the evidence level of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from very low (26.7%, 4/15) to ‘low’ (73.3%, 11/15).Conclusion Compared with propofol, there were very low or low evidence levels showing that ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms of patients with MDD undergoing a single ECT session. There is a need for high-quality RCTs.
url https://gpsych.bmj.com/content/33/3/e100117.full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaomeili effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT zhanmingshi effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT huahu effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT peijiawang effectsofketamineinelectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisordermetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724699036174254080