Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Recruiting participants to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often challenging, particularly when working with socially disadvantaged populations who are often termed ‘hard-to-reach’ in research. Here we report the recruitment strategies and costs for the Trial for Healthy R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alice MacLachlan, Karen Crawford, Shona Shinwell, Catherine Nixon, Marion Henderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05348-9
id doaj-0068cc3266464439bd1f6b137b78de1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0068cc3266464439bd1f6b137b78de1d2021-06-20T11:30:08ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-06-0122111510.1186/s13063-021-05348-9Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trialAlice MacLachlan0Karen Crawford1Shona Shinwell2Catherine Nixon3Marion Henderson4MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of GlasgowInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Level 4, Academic CAMHS, Yorkhill Hospital, University of GlasgowSchool of Health Sciences, University of DundeeScottish Children’s Reporter AdministrationMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of GlasgowAbstract Background Recruiting participants to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often challenging, particularly when working with socially disadvantaged populations who are often termed ‘hard-to-reach’ in research. Here we report the recruitment strategies and costs for the Trial for Healthy Relationship Initiatives in the Very Early years (THRIVE), an RCT evaluating two group-based parenting interventions for pregnant women. Methods THRIVE aimed to recruit 500 pregnant women with additional health and social care needs in Scotland between 2014 and 2018. Three recruitment strategies were employed: (1) referrals from a health or social care practitioner or voluntary/community organisation (practitioner-led referral), (2) direct engagement with potential participants by research staff (researcher-led recruitment) and (3) self-referral in response to study advertising (self-referral). The number of referrals and recruited participants from each strategy is reported along with the overall cost of recruitment. The impact of recruitment activities and the changes in maternity policy/context on recruitment throughout the study are examined. Results THRIVE received 973 referrals: 684 (70%) from practitioners (mainly specialist and general midwives), 273 (28%) from research nurses and 16 (2%) self-referrals. The time spent in antenatal clinics by research nurses each month was positively correlated with the number of referrals received (r = 0.57; p < 0.001). Changes in maternity policies and contexts were reflected in the number of referrals received each month, with both positive and negative impacts throughout the trial. Overall, 50% of referred women were recruited to the trial. Women referred via self-referral, THRIVE research nurses and specialist midwives were most likely to go on to be recruited (81%, 58% and 57%, respectively). Key contributors to recruitment included engaging key groups of referrers, establishing a large flexible workforce to enable recruitment activities to adapt to changes in context throughout the study and identifying the most appropriate setting to engage with potential participants. The overall cost of recruitment was £377 per randomised participant. Conclusions Recruitment resulted from a combination of all three strategies. Our reflections on the successes and challenges of these strategies highlight the need for recruitment strategies to be flexible to adapt to complex interventions and real-world challenges. These findings will inform future research in similar hard-to-reach populations. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry ISRCTN21656568 . Retrospectively registered on 28 February 2014https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05348-9Hard-to-reach populationMarginalised groupsMaternal healthPregnancyRandomised controlled trialRecruitment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alice MacLachlan
Karen Crawford
Shona Shinwell
Catherine Nixon
Marion Henderson
spellingShingle Alice MacLachlan
Karen Crawford
Shona Shinwell
Catherine Nixon
Marion Henderson
Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
Trials
Hard-to-reach population
Marginalised groups
Maternal health
Pregnancy
Randomised controlled trial
Recruitment
author_facet Alice MacLachlan
Karen Crawford
Shona Shinwell
Catherine Nixon
Marion Henderson
author_sort Alice MacLachlan
title Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
title_short Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
title_full Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
title_sort recruiting hard-to-reach pregnant women at high psychosocial risk: strategies and costs from a randomised controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background Recruiting participants to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often challenging, particularly when working with socially disadvantaged populations who are often termed ‘hard-to-reach’ in research. Here we report the recruitment strategies and costs for the Trial for Healthy Relationship Initiatives in the Very Early years (THRIVE), an RCT evaluating two group-based parenting interventions for pregnant women. Methods THRIVE aimed to recruit 500 pregnant women with additional health and social care needs in Scotland between 2014 and 2018. Three recruitment strategies were employed: (1) referrals from a health or social care practitioner or voluntary/community organisation (practitioner-led referral), (2) direct engagement with potential participants by research staff (researcher-led recruitment) and (3) self-referral in response to study advertising (self-referral). The number of referrals and recruited participants from each strategy is reported along with the overall cost of recruitment. The impact of recruitment activities and the changes in maternity policy/context on recruitment throughout the study are examined. Results THRIVE received 973 referrals: 684 (70%) from practitioners (mainly specialist and general midwives), 273 (28%) from research nurses and 16 (2%) self-referrals. The time spent in antenatal clinics by research nurses each month was positively correlated with the number of referrals received (r = 0.57; p < 0.001). Changes in maternity policies and contexts were reflected in the number of referrals received each month, with both positive and negative impacts throughout the trial. Overall, 50% of referred women were recruited to the trial. Women referred via self-referral, THRIVE research nurses and specialist midwives were most likely to go on to be recruited (81%, 58% and 57%, respectively). Key contributors to recruitment included engaging key groups of referrers, establishing a large flexible workforce to enable recruitment activities to adapt to changes in context throughout the study and identifying the most appropriate setting to engage with potential participants. The overall cost of recruitment was £377 per randomised participant. Conclusions Recruitment resulted from a combination of all three strategies. Our reflections on the successes and challenges of these strategies highlight the need for recruitment strategies to be flexible to adapt to complex interventions and real-world challenges. These findings will inform future research in similar hard-to-reach populations. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry ISRCTN21656568 . Retrospectively registered on 28 February 2014
topic Hard-to-reach population
Marginalised groups
Maternal health
Pregnancy
Randomised controlled trial
Recruitment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05348-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alicemaclachlan recruitinghardtoreachpregnantwomenathighpsychosocialriskstrategiesandcostsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT karencrawford recruitinghardtoreachpregnantwomenathighpsychosocialriskstrategiesandcostsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shonashinwell recruitinghardtoreachpregnantwomenathighpsychosocialriskstrategiesandcostsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT catherinenixon recruitinghardtoreachpregnantwomenathighpsychosocialriskstrategiesandcostsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marionhenderson recruitinghardtoreachpregnantwomenathighpsychosocialriskstrategiesandcostsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721369941787017216