The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale

Abstract Objectives A lack of consensus on how to classify post‐operative complications in dentistry limits the ability for comparison of outcomes among treatments and their primary providers. Therefore, the Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale has been proposed as a uniform rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter C. Fritz, Amanda B. Longo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-12-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.235
id doaj-0064e52e21804bb18fefbfa400679503
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0064e52e21804bb18fefbfa4006795032020-11-25T00:26:52ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472019-12-015672573010.1002/cre2.235The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification ScalePeter C. Fritz0Amanda B. Longo1Dr. Peter C. Fritz Periodontal Wellness & Implant Surgery Fonthill ON CanadaDr. Peter C. Fritz Periodontal Wellness & Implant Surgery Fonthill ON CanadaAbstract Objectives A lack of consensus on how to classify post‐operative complications in dentistry limits the ability for comparison of outcomes among treatments and their primary providers. Therefore, the Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale has been proposed as a uniform reporting tool to allow for the standardized quality assessment of dental treatment. This instrument classifies negative outcomes arising after dental treatment and is based on the clinician and the clinician time required to resolve the complication in seven classes of increasing severity. Materials and Methods The scale was evaluated in a cohort of 2,382 consecutive patients, of which 9% experienced a complication, the majority of which were Class I or Class II—resolved without intervention by the dental surgeon. Results Four scenarios where interpretation of the scale was required are presented with an explanation of their complication class. Conclusions This classification system will ultimately prove reliable in measuring clinician success rate and aiding in the decision‐making process for patients, clinicians, and financial providers.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.235classificationcomplicationdentalimplantperiodontal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter C. Fritz
Amanda B. Longo
spellingShingle Peter C. Fritz
Amanda B. Longo
The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
classification
complication
dental
implant
periodontal
author_facet Peter C. Fritz
Amanda B. Longo
author_sort Peter C. Fritz
title The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
title_short The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
title_full The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
title_fullStr The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
title_full_unstemmed The Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale
title_sort fonthill dental surgery complication classification scale
publisher Wiley
series Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
issn 2057-4347
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Objectives A lack of consensus on how to classify post‐operative complications in dentistry limits the ability for comparison of outcomes among treatments and their primary providers. Therefore, the Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale has been proposed as a uniform reporting tool to allow for the standardized quality assessment of dental treatment. This instrument classifies negative outcomes arising after dental treatment and is based on the clinician and the clinician time required to resolve the complication in seven classes of increasing severity. Materials and Methods The scale was evaluated in a cohort of 2,382 consecutive patients, of which 9% experienced a complication, the majority of which were Class I or Class II—resolved without intervention by the dental surgeon. Results Four scenarios where interpretation of the scale was required are presented with an explanation of their complication class. Conclusions This classification system will ultimately prove reliable in measuring clinician success rate and aiding in the decision‐making process for patients, clinicians, and financial providers.
topic classification
complication
dental
implant
periodontal
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.235
work_keys_str_mv AT petercfritz thefonthilldentalsurgerycomplicationclassificationscale
AT amandablongo thefonthilldentalsurgerycomplicationclassificationscale
AT petercfritz fonthilldentalsurgerycomplicationclassificationscale
AT amandablongo fonthilldentalsurgerycomplicationclassificationscale
_version_ 1725342056581169152