Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty.
The ability to automatically segment an image into distinct regions is a critical aspect in many visual processing applications. Because inaccuracies often exist in automatic segmentation, manual segmentation is necessary in some application domains to correct mistakes, such as required in the recon...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3448604?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-0060e72f32f742b0aedf5dc525fc2800 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0060e72f32f742b0aedf5dc525fc28002020-11-24T21:41:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4444810.1371/journal.pone.0044448Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty.Stephen M PlazaLouis K SchefferMathew SaundersThe ability to automatically segment an image into distinct regions is a critical aspect in many visual processing applications. Because inaccuracies often exist in automatic segmentation, manual segmentation is necessary in some application domains to correct mistakes, such as required in the reconstruction of neuronal processes from microscopic images. The goal of the automated segmentation tool is traditionally to produce the highest-quality segmentation, where quality is measured by the similarity to actual ground truth, so as to minimize the volume of manual correction necessary. Manual correction is generally orders-of-magnitude more time consuming than automated segmentation, often making handling large images intractable. Therefore, we propose a more relevant goal: minimizing the turn-around time of automated/manual segmentation while attaining a level of similarity with ground truth. It is not always necessary to inspect every aspect of an image to generate a useful segmentation. As such, we propose a strategy to guide manual segmentation to the most uncertain parts of segmentation. Our contributions include 1) a probabilistic measure that evaluates segmentation without ground truth and 2) a methodology that leverages these probabilistic measures to significantly reduce manual correction while maintaining segmentation quality.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3448604?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephen M Plaza Louis K Scheffer Mathew Saunders |
spellingShingle |
Stephen M Plaza Louis K Scheffer Mathew Saunders Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Stephen M Plaza Louis K Scheffer Mathew Saunders |
author_sort |
Stephen M Plaza |
title |
Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
title_short |
Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
title_full |
Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
title_fullStr |
Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
title_sort |
minimizing manual image segmentation turn-around time for neuronal reconstruction by embracing uncertainty. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
The ability to automatically segment an image into distinct regions is a critical aspect in many visual processing applications. Because inaccuracies often exist in automatic segmentation, manual segmentation is necessary in some application domains to correct mistakes, such as required in the reconstruction of neuronal processes from microscopic images. The goal of the automated segmentation tool is traditionally to produce the highest-quality segmentation, where quality is measured by the similarity to actual ground truth, so as to minimize the volume of manual correction necessary. Manual correction is generally orders-of-magnitude more time consuming than automated segmentation, often making handling large images intractable. Therefore, we propose a more relevant goal: minimizing the turn-around time of automated/manual segmentation while attaining a level of similarity with ground truth. It is not always necessary to inspect every aspect of an image to generate a useful segmentation. As such, we propose a strategy to guide manual segmentation to the most uncertain parts of segmentation. Our contributions include 1) a probabilistic measure that evaluates segmentation without ground truth and 2) a methodology that leverages these probabilistic measures to significantly reduce manual correction while maintaining segmentation quality. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3448604?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenmplaza minimizingmanualimagesegmentationturnaroundtimeforneuronalreconstructionbyembracinguncertainty AT louiskscheffer minimizingmanualimagesegmentationturnaroundtimeforneuronalreconstructionbyembracinguncertainty AT mathewsaunders minimizingmanualimagesegmentationturnaroundtimeforneuronalreconstructionbyembracinguncertainty |
_version_ |
1725919919747366912 |