The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful

Objective: To analyse a matrix model of management to optimize the partnerships, collaboration and interaction between vertical management structures (services and geographical clusters) and horizontal clinical structures (Clinical Networks and Streams) in a large Local Health District [LHD] in New...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phillip Lewis Way, Patricia M Davidson, Gail Winkworth, Michael White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ACHSM 2019-03-01
Series:Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/211
id doaj-0054aac2807041818ce5f95db0f697c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0054aac2807041818ce5f95db0f697c12021-03-09T17:34:56ZengACHSM Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management1833-38182204-31362019-03-0114110.24083/apjhm.v14i1.211161The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix SuccessfulPhillip Lewis Way0Patricia M Davidson1Gail Winkworth2Michael White3Hunter New England HealthHunter New England HealthAustralian Catholic UniversitySuccessful Collaborations Objective: To analyse a matrix model of management to optimize the partnerships, collaboration and interaction between vertical management structures (services and geographical clusters) and horizontal clinical structures (Clinical Networks and Streams) in a large Local Health District [LHD] in New South Wales, Australia. Approach: An ‘Action Research’ approach utilising a maturity tool, the Collaboration Rubric®, an evidence-based model for Network analysis. The rubric describes four types of collaboration and defines the three essential drivers that allow successful collaborations. Outcomes: Benchmarking comparisons indicate that this LHD is operating at a level well above base level for the three drivers that enable collaboration [capacity, authority and shared value]. The professional relationship between Clinical Networks/ Streams and Operational Managers, is the main barrier to improving collaboration. The Operational Managers have clear positional authority related to the organisational structure and are accountable to their Executive for good governance and financial management. Clinical leaders hold substantial influential power derived from their professional authority. The following actions have been identified to improve collaboration. • Ensure all leaders actively “manage for collaboration“ • Executive fosters joint innovation projects characterised by collaborative practice between the Clinical Networks/Streams and Operational Managers. • Ensure leadership accountabilities are held as close as possible to any projects (locally) involving reform or innovation • Clinical Network/Streams’ operational plans are jointly agreed with local management and signed off by Executive • LHD recruit leadership with skills in managing for collaboration Conclusions: This evaluation supports the use an Action Research approach using the Collaboration Rubric® as a useful tool to define not only the type of collaboration required but the key drivers that must be addressed to facilitate improved [horizontal and vertical] partnerships leading to better outcomes. This local health district will build improved collaboration utilising the insights gained from this analysis. https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/211Clinical Networks , Collaboration rubric , Matrix structure , Partnerships
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Phillip Lewis Way
Patricia M Davidson
Gail Winkworth
Michael White
spellingShingle Phillip Lewis Way
Patricia M Davidson
Gail Winkworth
Michael White
The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Clinical Networks , Collaboration rubric , Matrix structure , Partnerships
author_facet Phillip Lewis Way
Patricia M Davidson
Gail Winkworth
Michael White
author_sort Phillip Lewis Way
title The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
title_short The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
title_full The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
title_fullStr The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
title_full_unstemmed The Pursuit of Purposeful Partnerships-Making A Health Matrix Successful
title_sort pursuit of purposeful partnerships-making a health matrix successful
publisher ACHSM
series Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
issn 1833-3818
2204-3136
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Objective: To analyse a matrix model of management to optimize the partnerships, collaboration and interaction between vertical management structures (services and geographical clusters) and horizontal clinical structures (Clinical Networks and Streams) in a large Local Health District [LHD] in New South Wales, Australia. Approach: An ‘Action Research’ approach utilising a maturity tool, the Collaboration Rubric®, an evidence-based model for Network analysis. The rubric describes four types of collaboration and defines the three essential drivers that allow successful collaborations. Outcomes: Benchmarking comparisons indicate that this LHD is operating at a level well above base level for the three drivers that enable collaboration [capacity, authority and shared value]. The professional relationship between Clinical Networks/ Streams and Operational Managers, is the main barrier to improving collaboration. The Operational Managers have clear positional authority related to the organisational structure and are accountable to their Executive for good governance and financial management. Clinical leaders hold substantial influential power derived from their professional authority. The following actions have been identified to improve collaboration. • Ensure all leaders actively “manage for collaboration“ • Executive fosters joint innovation projects characterised by collaborative practice between the Clinical Networks/Streams and Operational Managers. • Ensure leadership accountabilities are held as close as possible to any projects (locally) involving reform or innovation • Clinical Network/Streams’ operational plans are jointly agreed with local management and signed off by Executive • LHD recruit leadership with skills in managing for collaboration Conclusions: This evaluation supports the use an Action Research approach using the Collaboration Rubric® as a useful tool to define not only the type of collaboration required but the key drivers that must be addressed to facilitate improved [horizontal and vertical] partnerships leading to better outcomes. This local health district will build improved collaboration utilising the insights gained from this analysis.
topic Clinical Networks , Collaboration rubric , Matrix structure , Partnerships
url https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/211
work_keys_str_mv AT philliplewisway thepursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT patriciamdavidson thepursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT gailwinkworth thepursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT michaelwhite thepursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT philliplewisway pursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT patriciamdavidson pursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT gailwinkworth pursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
AT michaelwhite pursuitofpurposefulpartnershipsmakingahealthmatrixsuccessful
_version_ 1724227434758275072