CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
Objectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101 |
id |
doaj-0043cd03b61b41efb1f332339757fd2d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0043cd03b61b41efb1f332339757fd2d2021-06-11T22:47:32ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology2581-91782021-06-0110.1055/s-0041-1730101CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative StudyDeepak Singla0Shruti Chandak1Ankur Malhotra2Arjit Agarwal3Tanu Raman4Mohini Chaudhary5Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaObjectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for computed tomography enterography (CTE). Methods This was a prospective study including 120 patients of age more than or equal to 18 years who were randomized equally into four groups. Group 1 was given 1500 mL of 3% mannitol solution, group 2 was given 1500 mL of PEG, group 3 was given 20 mL of iohexol dissolved in 1500 mL of water, and group 4 was given 1500 mL of plain water. CTE was done and images were evaluated in axial and coronal planes. Various quantitative and qualitative parameters were taken at the level of second part of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ileocecal junction (ICJ). Artifacts and patient feedback were also taken into consideration. Results The quantitative distension and grading, qualitative distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity of the second part of duodenum, jejunum at the level of superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery and renal artery on both sides of abdomen, ileum at the level of aortic bifurcation, common iliac bifurcation, and deep pelvis on both sides of abdomen and ICJ were significantly more in PEG group as compared with mannitol group, followed by iohexol and water group. The results were calculated by ANOVA test using p-value. In terms of patient feedback and artifacts, water was the best agent. Conclusions PEG is the most suitable contrast agent to carry out CTE. Distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity are the essential features for a better diagnostic outcome of CTE, which was better with PEG.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101intestineiohexolmannitolmultidetector computed tomographypolyethylene glycolsradiology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Deepak Singla Shruti Chandak Ankur Malhotra Arjit Agarwal Tanu Raman Mohini Chaudhary |
spellingShingle |
Deepak Singla Shruti Chandak Ankur Malhotra Arjit Agarwal Tanu Raman Mohini Chaudhary CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology intestine iohexol mannitol multidetector computed tomography polyethylene glycols radiology |
author_facet |
Deepak Singla Shruti Chandak Ankur Malhotra Arjit Agarwal Tanu Raman Mohini Chaudhary |
author_sort |
Deepak Singla |
title |
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study |
title_short |
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study |
title_full |
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr |
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study |
title_sort |
ct enterography using four different endoluminal contrast agents: a comparative study |
publisher |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
series |
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology |
issn |
2581-9178 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Objectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for computed tomography enterography (CTE).
Methods This was a prospective study including 120 patients of age more than or equal to 18 years who were randomized equally into four groups. Group 1 was given 1500 mL of 3% mannitol solution, group 2 was given 1500 mL of PEG, group 3 was given 20 mL of iohexol dissolved in 1500 mL of water, and group 4 was given 1500 mL of plain water. CTE was done and images were evaluated in axial and coronal planes. Various quantitative and qualitative parameters were taken at the level of second part of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ileocecal junction (ICJ). Artifacts and patient feedback were also taken into consideration.
Results The quantitative distension and grading, qualitative distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity of the second part of duodenum, jejunum at the level of superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery and renal artery on both sides of abdomen, ileum at the level of aortic bifurcation, common iliac bifurcation, and deep pelvis on both sides of abdomen and ICJ were significantly more in PEG group as compared with mannitol group, followed by iohexol and water group. The results were calculated by ANOVA test using p-value. In terms of patient feedback and artifacts, water was the best agent.
Conclusions PEG is the most suitable contrast agent to carry out CTE. Distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity are the essential features for a better diagnostic outcome of CTE, which was better with PEG. |
topic |
intestine iohexol mannitol multidetector computed tomography polyethylene glycols radiology |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deepaksingla ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy AT shrutichandak ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy AT ankurmalhotra ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy AT arjitagarwal ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy AT tanuraman ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy AT mohinichaudhary ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy |
_version_ |
1721381755868413952 |