CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study

Objectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepak Singla, Shruti Chandak, Ankur Malhotra, Arjit Agarwal, Tanu Raman, Mohini Chaudhary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101
id doaj-0043cd03b61b41efb1f332339757fd2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0043cd03b61b41efb1f332339757fd2d2021-06-11T22:47:32ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology2581-91782021-06-0110.1055/s-0041-1730101CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative StudyDeepak Singla0Shruti Chandak1Ankur Malhotra2Arjit Agarwal3Tanu Raman4Mohini Chaudhary5Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaObjectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for computed tomography enterography (CTE). Methods This was a prospective study including 120 patients of age more than or equal to 18 years who were randomized equally into four groups. Group 1 was given 1500 mL of 3% mannitol solution, group 2 was given 1500 mL of PEG, group 3 was given 20 mL of iohexol dissolved in 1500 mL of water, and group 4 was given 1500 mL of plain water. CTE was done and images were evaluated in axial and coronal planes. Various quantitative and qualitative parameters were taken at the level of second part of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ileocecal junction (ICJ). Artifacts and patient feedback were also taken into consideration. Results The quantitative distension and grading, qualitative distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity of the second part of duodenum, jejunum at the level of superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery and renal artery on both sides of abdomen, ileum at the level of aortic bifurcation, common iliac bifurcation, and deep pelvis on both sides of abdomen and ICJ were significantly more in PEG group as compared with mannitol group, followed by iohexol and water group. The results were calculated by ANOVA test using p-value. In terms of patient feedback and artifacts, water was the best agent. Conclusions PEG is the most suitable contrast agent to carry out CTE. Distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity are the essential features for a better diagnostic outcome of CTE, which was better with PEG.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101intestineiohexolmannitolmultidetector computed tomographypolyethylene glycolsradiology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deepak Singla
Shruti Chandak
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Tanu Raman
Mohini Chaudhary
spellingShingle Deepak Singla
Shruti Chandak
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Tanu Raman
Mohini Chaudhary
CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
intestine
iohexol
mannitol
multidetector computed tomography
polyethylene glycols
radiology
author_facet Deepak Singla
Shruti Chandak
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Tanu Raman
Mohini Chaudhary
author_sort Deepak Singla
title CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
title_short CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
title_full CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed CT Enterography Using Four Different Endoluminal Contrast Agents: A Comparative Study
title_sort ct enterography using four different endoluminal contrast agents: a comparative study
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
series Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
issn 2581-9178
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Objectives To determine the most preferable endoluminal contrast agent among mannitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), iohexol, and water by comparing various qualitative (distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity) and quantitative parameters (distension) along with artifacts and patient feedback for computed tomography enterography (CTE). Methods This was a prospective study including 120 patients of age more than or equal to 18 years who were randomized equally into four groups. Group 1 was given 1500 mL of 3% mannitol solution, group 2 was given 1500 mL of PEG, group 3 was given 20 mL of iohexol dissolved in 1500 mL of water, and group 4 was given 1500 mL of plain water. CTE was done and images were evaluated in axial and coronal planes. Various quantitative and qualitative parameters were taken at the level of second part of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ileocecal junction (ICJ). Artifacts and patient feedback were also taken into consideration. Results The quantitative distension and grading, qualitative distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity of the second part of duodenum, jejunum at the level of superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery and renal artery on both sides of abdomen, ileum at the level of aortic bifurcation, common iliac bifurcation, and deep pelvis on both sides of abdomen and ICJ were significantly more in PEG group as compared with mannitol group, followed by iohexol and water group. The results were calculated by ANOVA test using p-value. In terms of patient feedback and artifacts, water was the best agent. Conclusions PEG is the most suitable contrast agent to carry out CTE. Distension, fold visibility, and homogeneity are the essential features for a better diagnostic outcome of CTE, which was better with PEG.
topic intestine
iohexol
mannitol
multidetector computed tomography
polyethylene glycols
radiology
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730101
work_keys_str_mv AT deepaksingla ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
AT shrutichandak ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
AT ankurmalhotra ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
AT arjitagarwal ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
AT tanuraman ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
AT mohinichaudhary ctenterographyusingfourdifferentendoluminalcontrastagentsacomparativestudy
_version_ 1721381755868413952