Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Patrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and pos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oellers P, Stinnett S, Hahn P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-05-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
PVR
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
id doaj-002b8359461e4054a4740c4a016a4e86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-002b8359461e4054a4740c4a016a4e862020-11-24T22:37:26ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832016-05-012016Issue 11001100627194Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathyOellers PStinnett SHahn PPatrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and postoperative complication rates of valved vs nonvalved cannula small-gauge PPV for repair of retinal detachments (RDs) complicated by Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Methods: A retrospective chart review of 364 consecutive eyes with either valved or nonvalved cannula PPV for RD repair was performed. The primary outcomes were single surgery and final anatomic success and change in best-corrected visual acuity for repair of RDs complicated by Grade C PVR.Results: We identified 36 eyes in the valved group and 31 eyes in the nonvalved group with Grade C PVR RD. The single surgery success was 83% vs 77% (P=0.555) and the final anatomic success was 94% vs 87% (P=0.404) in the valved vs nonvalved eyes, respectively. The mean final visual acuity gain was −0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximate Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] score =17 letters) in valved eyes vs −0.33 logMAR (approximate ETDRS score =16 letters) in nonvalved eyes (P=0.81). Postoperative complication rates including postoperative day 1 hypotony, hypertony, and anterior chamber fibrin formation; postoperative retention of intraocular or subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid; and subsequent epiretinal membrane peel were not statistically different between groups.Conclusion: Valved cannula PPV yields equivalent visual acuity and anatomic outcomes without increased postoperative complication rates compared to traditional nonvalved cannula PPV for Grade C PVR-associated RD repair. Keywords: 23 gauge, 25 gauge, PVR, RD, chronic, single surgery success, final anatomic successhttps://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHvalved cannulasnonvalvedPVRretinal detachmentsvitrectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oellers P
Stinnett S
Hahn P
spellingShingle Oellers P
Stinnett S
Hahn P
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Clinical Ophthalmology
valved cannulas
nonvalved
PVR
retinal detachments
vitrectomy
author_facet Oellers P
Stinnett S
Hahn P
author_sort Oellers P
title Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
title_short Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
title_full Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
title_fullStr Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
title_sort valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with grade c proliferative vitreoretinopathy
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Patrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and postoperative complication rates of valved vs nonvalved cannula small-gauge PPV for repair of retinal detachments (RDs) complicated by Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Methods: A retrospective chart review of 364 consecutive eyes with either valved or nonvalved cannula PPV for RD repair was performed. The primary outcomes were single surgery and final anatomic success and change in best-corrected visual acuity for repair of RDs complicated by Grade C PVR.Results: We identified 36 eyes in the valved group and 31 eyes in the nonvalved group with Grade C PVR RD. The single surgery success was 83% vs 77% (P=0.555) and the final anatomic success was 94% vs 87% (P=0.404) in the valved vs nonvalved eyes, respectively. The mean final visual acuity gain was −0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximate Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] score =17 letters) in valved eyes vs −0.33 logMAR (approximate ETDRS score =16 letters) in nonvalved eyes (P=0.81). Postoperative complication rates including postoperative day 1 hypotony, hypertony, and anterior chamber fibrin formation; postoperative retention of intraocular or subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid; and subsequent epiretinal membrane peel were not statistically different between groups.Conclusion: Valved cannula PPV yields equivalent visual acuity and anatomic outcomes without increased postoperative complication rates compared to traditional nonvalved cannula PPV for Grade C PVR-associated RD repair. Keywords: 23 gauge, 25 gauge, PVR, RD, chronic, single surgery success, final anatomic success
topic valved cannulas
nonvalved
PVR
retinal detachments
vitrectomy
url https://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT oellersp valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy
AT stinnetts valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy
AT hahnp valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy
_version_ 1725717064310587392