Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Patrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and pos...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
id |
doaj-002b8359461e4054a4740c4a016a4e86 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-002b8359461e4054a4740c4a016a4e862020-11-24T22:37:26ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832016-05-012016Issue 11001100627194Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathyOellers PStinnett SHahn PPatrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and postoperative complication rates of valved vs nonvalved cannula small-gauge PPV for repair of retinal detachments (RDs) complicated by Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Methods: A retrospective chart review of 364 consecutive eyes with either valved or nonvalved cannula PPV for RD repair was performed. The primary outcomes were single surgery and final anatomic success and change in best-corrected visual acuity for repair of RDs complicated by Grade C PVR.Results: We identified 36 eyes in the valved group and 31 eyes in the nonvalved group with Grade C PVR RD. The single surgery success was 83% vs 77% (P=0.555) and the final anatomic success was 94% vs 87% (P=0.404) in the valved vs nonvalved eyes, respectively. The mean final visual acuity gain was −0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximate Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] score =17 letters) in valved eyes vs −0.33 logMAR (approximate ETDRS score =16 letters) in nonvalved eyes (P=0.81). Postoperative complication rates including postoperative day 1 hypotony, hypertony, and anterior chamber fibrin formation; postoperative retention of intraocular or subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid; and subsequent epiretinal membrane peel were not statistically different between groups.Conclusion: Valved cannula PPV yields equivalent visual acuity and anatomic outcomes without increased postoperative complication rates compared to traditional nonvalved cannula PPV for Grade C PVR-associated RD repair. Keywords: 23 gauge, 25 gauge, PVR, RD, chronic, single surgery success, final anatomic successhttps://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHvalved cannulasnonvalvedPVRretinal detachmentsvitrectomy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Oellers P Stinnett S Hahn P |
spellingShingle |
Oellers P Stinnett S Hahn P Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy Clinical Ophthalmology valved cannulas nonvalved PVR retinal detachments vitrectomy |
author_facet |
Oellers P Stinnett S Hahn P |
author_sort |
Oellers P |
title |
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
title_short |
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
title_full |
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
title_fullStr |
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
title_sort |
valved versus nonvalved cannula small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachments with grade c proliferative vitreoretinopathy |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Clinical Ophthalmology |
issn |
1177-5483 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
Patrick Oellers, Sandra Stinnett, Paul Hahn Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Purpose: Valved cannulas are a recent addition to small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and provide stable intraocular fluidics. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and postoperative complication rates of valved vs nonvalved cannula small-gauge PPV for repair of retinal detachments (RDs) complicated by Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Methods: A retrospective chart review of 364 consecutive eyes with either valved or nonvalved cannula PPV for RD repair was performed. The primary outcomes were single surgery and final anatomic success and change in best-corrected visual acuity for repair of RDs complicated by Grade C PVR.Results: We identified 36 eyes in the valved group and 31 eyes in the nonvalved group with Grade C PVR RD. The single surgery success was 83% vs 77% (P=0.555) and the final anatomic success was 94% vs 87% (P=0.404) in the valved vs nonvalved eyes, respectively. The mean final visual acuity gain was −0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximate Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] score =17 letters) in valved eyes vs −0.33 logMAR (approximate ETDRS score =16 letters) in nonvalved eyes (P=0.81). Postoperative complication rates including postoperative day 1 hypotony, hypertony, and anterior chamber fibrin formation; postoperative retention of intraocular or subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid; and subsequent epiretinal membrane peel were not statistically different between groups.Conclusion: Valved cannula PPV yields equivalent visual acuity and anatomic outcomes without increased postoperative complication rates compared to traditional nonvalved cannula PPV for Grade C PVR-associated RD repair. Keywords: 23 gauge, 25 gauge, PVR, RD, chronic, single surgery success, final anatomic success |
topic |
valved cannulas nonvalved PVR retinal detachments vitrectomy |
url |
https://www.dovepress.com/valved-versus-nonvalved-cannula-small-gauge-pars-plana-vitrectomy-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oellersp valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy AT stinnetts valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy AT hahnp valvedversusnonvalvedcannulasmallgaugeparsplanavitrectomyforrepairofretinaldetachmentswithgradecproliferativevitreoretinopathy |
_version_ |
1725717064310587392 |