Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency

The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``succ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anastasia Ejova, Daniel J. Navarro, Paul H. Delfabbro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2013-07-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdf
id doaj-0016f78dd9d24f1eb1f0e6172559b0a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0016f78dd9d24f1eb1f0e6172559b0a12021-05-02T09:20:18ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752013-07-0184498511Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequencyAnastasia EjovaDaniel J. NavarroPaul H. DelfabbroThe illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``success-slope'' effect. Previous studies have generated inconsistent findings regarding the nature of this effect. In this paper we present an experiment (N = 334) that overcomes several methodological limitations within this literature, employing a wider range of dependent measures (measures of two different types of illusory control, primary (by self) and secondary (by luck), as well as measures of remembered success-frequency). Results indicate that different dependent measures lead to different effects. On measures of (primary, but not secondary) control over the task, scores were highest when the rate of success increased over time. Meanwhile, estimates of success-frequency in the task did not vary across conditions and showed trends consistent with the broader literature on human memory.http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdfillusion of controlsequence of outcomessuccess slopeprimary and secondarycontrol.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anastasia Ejova
Daniel J. Navarro
Paul H. Delfabbro
spellingShingle Anastasia Ejova
Daniel J. Navarro
Paul H. Delfabbro
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
Judgment and Decision Making
illusion of control
sequence of outcomes
success slope
primary and secondarycontrol.
author_facet Anastasia Ejova
Daniel J. Navarro
Paul H. Delfabbro
author_sort Anastasia Ejova
title Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
title_short Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
title_full Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
title_fullStr Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
title_full_unstemmed Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
title_sort success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2013-07-01
description The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``success-slope'' effect. Previous studies have generated inconsistent findings regarding the nature of this effect. In this paper we present an experiment (N = 334) that overcomes several methodological limitations within this literature, employing a wider range of dependent measures (measures of two different types of illusory control, primary (by self) and secondary (by luck), as well as measures of remembered success-frequency). Results indicate that different dependent measures lead to different effects. On measures of (primary, but not secondary) control over the task, scores were highest when the rate of success increased over time. Meanwhile, estimates of success-frequency in the task did not vary across conditions and showed trends consistent with the broader literature on human memory.
topic illusion of control
sequence of outcomes
success slope
primary and secondarycontrol.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiaejova successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency
AT danieljnavarro successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency
AT paulhdelfabbro successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency
_version_ 1721493381752815616