Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency
The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``succ...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2013-07-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdf |
id |
doaj-0016f78dd9d24f1eb1f0e6172559b0a1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0016f78dd9d24f1eb1f0e6172559b0a12021-05-02T09:20:18ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752013-07-0184498511Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequencyAnastasia EjovaDaniel J. NavarroPaul H. DelfabbroThe illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``success-slope'' effect. Previous studies have generated inconsistent findings regarding the nature of this effect. In this paper we present an experiment (N = 334) that overcomes several methodological limitations within this literature, employing a wider range of dependent measures (measures of two different types of illusory control, primary (by self) and secondary (by luck), as well as measures of remembered success-frequency). Results indicate that different dependent measures lead to different effects. On measures of (primary, but not secondary) control over the task, scores were highest when the rate of success increased over time. Meanwhile, estimates of success-frequency in the task did not vary across conditions and showed trends consistent with the broader literature on human memory.http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdfillusion of controlsequence of outcomessuccess slopeprimary and secondarycontrol. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anastasia Ejova Daniel J. Navarro Paul H. Delfabbro |
spellingShingle |
Anastasia Ejova Daniel J. Navarro Paul H. Delfabbro Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency Judgment and Decision Making illusion of control sequence of outcomes success slope primary and secondarycontrol. |
author_facet |
Anastasia Ejova Daniel J. Navarro Paul H. Delfabbro |
author_sort |
Anastasia Ejova |
title |
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
title_short |
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
title_full |
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
title_fullStr |
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
title_sort |
success-slope effects on the illusion of control and on remembered success-frequency |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2013-07-01 |
description |
The illusion of control refers to the inference of action-outcome contingency in situations where outcomes are in fact random. The strength of this illusion has been found to be affected by whether the frequency of successes increases or decreases over repeated trials, in what can be termed a ``success-slope'' effect. Previous studies have generated inconsistent findings regarding the nature of this effect. In this paper we present an experiment (N = 334) that overcomes several methodological limitations within this literature, employing a wider range of dependent measures (measures of two different types of illusory control, primary (by self) and secondary (by luck), as well as measures of remembered success-frequency). Results indicate that different dependent measures lead to different effects. On measures of (primary, but not secondary) control over the task, scores were highest when the rate of success increased over time. Meanwhile, estimates of success-frequency in the task did not vary across conditions and showed trends consistent with the broader literature on human memory. |
topic |
illusion of control sequence of outcomes success slope primary and secondarycontrol. |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12912/jdm12912.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anastasiaejova successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency AT danieljnavarro successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency AT paulhdelfabbro successslopeeffectsontheillusionofcontrolandonrememberedsuccessfrequency |
_version_ |
1721493381752815616 |