Work Requirements Race, Disability, and the Print Culture of Social Welfare

Throughout the history of the United States, work-based social welfare practices have served to affirm the moral value of work. In the late nineteenth century this representational project came to be mediated by the printed word with the emergence of industrial print technologies, the expansion of l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Duke University Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02936namaa2200421uu 4500
001 doab97680
003 oapen
005 20230303
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 230303s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781478015444 
020 |a 9781478018070 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
720 1 |a Carmody, Todd  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Work Requirements  |b Race, Disability, and the Print Culture of Social Welfare 
260 |b Duke University Press  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Throughout the history of the United States, work-based social welfare practices have served to affirm the moral value of work. In the late nineteenth century this representational project came to be mediated by the printed word with the emergence of industrial print technologies, the expansion of literacy, and the rise of professionalization. In Work Requirements Todd Carmody asks how work, even the most debasing or unproductive labor, came to be seen as inherently meaningful during this era. He explores how the print culture of social welfare-produced by public administrators, by economic planners, by social scientists, and in literature and the arts-tasked people on the social and economic margins, specifically racial minorities, incarcerated people, and people with disabilities, with shoring up the fundamental dignity of work as such. He also outlines how disability itself became a tool of social discipline, defined by bureaucratized institutions as the inability to work. By interrogating the representational effort necessary to make work seem inherently meaningful, Carmody ultimately reveals a forgotten history of competing efforts to think social belonging beyond or even without work. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
653 |a African American & Black Studies 
653 |a American 
653 |a Ethnic Studies 
653 |a People With Disabilities 
653 |a Social Science 
653 |a Social Science 
653 |a thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBF Social and ethical issues::JBFM Disability: social aspects 
653 |a thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBS Social groups, communities and identities::JBSL Ethnic studies 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/97680  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/61573/1/external_content.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication