Field Of Dreams

One of the first collections to focus on independent writing programs, A Field of Dreams offers a complex picture of the experience of the stand-alone. Included here are narratives of individual programs from a wide range of institutions, exploring such issues as what institutional issues led to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Utah State University Press 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02608namaa2200349uu 4500
001 doab94665
003 oapen
005 20221208
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 221208s2003 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780874214642 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a CBV  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a O'Neill, Peggy  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Field Of Dreams 
260 |b Utah State University Press  |c 2003 
300 |a 1 online resource (325 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a One of the first collections to focus on independent writing programs, A Field of Dreams offers a complex picture of the experience of the stand-alone. Included here are narratives of individual programs from a wide range of institutions, exploring such issues as what institutional issues led to their independence, how independence solved or created administrative problems, how it changed the culture of the writing program and faculty sense of purpose, success, or failure. Further chapters build larger ideas about the advantages and disadvantages of stand-alone status, covering labor issues, promotion/tenure issues, institutional politics, and others. A retrospective on the famous controversy at Minnesota is included, along with a look at the long-established independent programs at Harvard and Syracuse. Finally, the book considers disciplinary questions raised by the growth of stand-alone programs. Authors here respond with critique and reflection to ideas raised by other chapters-do current independent models inadvertently diminish the influence of rhetoric and composition scholarship? Do they tend to ignore the outward movement of literacy toward technology? Can they be structured to enhance interdisciplinary or writing-across-the-curriculum efforts? Can independent programs play a more influential role in the university than they do from the English department? 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Creative writing and creative writing guides  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Creative writing & creative writing guides 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/94665  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/9264  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication