Critical Pluralism, Democratic Performance, and Community Power

A central question in political science is who governs and how.Typically political scientists attempt to answer this question by relying upon either empirical analysis, which explains existing political practices, or normative analysis, which prescribes ideal political practices.Political scientist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: University Press of Kansas 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02629namaa2200373uu 4500
001 doab93153
003 oapen
005 20221025
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 221025s1991 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780700631186 
020 |a book.81043 
024 7 |a 10.1353/book.81043  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JPR  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Schumaker, Paul  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Critical Pluralism, Democratic Performance, and Community Power 
260 |b University Press of Kansas  |c 1991 
300 |a 1 online resource (280 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a A central question in political science is who governs and how.Typically political scientists attempt to answer this question by relying upon either empirical analysis, which explains existing political practices, or normative analysis, which prescribes ideal political practices.Political scientist Paul Schumaker rejects this distinction between empirical and normative theory. Instead, he weds the two approaches to create the new analytical mode he calls critical pluralism. With it he can measure variances in government from pluralist/democratic ideals and still provide theoretical explanations of why the variances occurred.Schumaker uses critical pluralism to describe, explain, and evaluate variations in three key measures of democratic performance: responsible representation, complex equality, and principlepolicy congruence. To test his framework and methodology he analyzes 29 community issues that arose in Lawrence, Kansas, between 1977 and 1987. The results of his study-one of the most comprehensive databases ever in the study of community politics-will be of interest to those who study community power. The conceptual framework itself and methodology used in assessing democratic performance will have a lasting impact on the way community government is studied. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Regional, state and other local government  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Regional, state & other local government 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/93153  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/81043  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication