Chapter 10 Animal, Mechanical, and Me Organ Transplantation and the Ambiguity of Embodiment

Organ donation and transplantation is a largely successful treatment used to replace failing organs. However, donation rates have never met the demand for transplantable organs. Biomedical researchers are exploring alternative sources from nonhuman animal donors such as pigs; improved biotechnologic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02843namaa2200361uu 4500
001 doab64613
003 oapen
005 20210415
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210415s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a MBF  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Haddow, Gill  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Chapter 10 Animal, Mechanical, and Me  |b Organ Transplantation and the Ambiguity of Embodiment 
260 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 online resource (14 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Organ donation and transplantation is a largely successful treatment used to replace failing organs. However, donation rates have never met the demand for transplantable organs. Biomedical researchers are exploring alternative sources from nonhuman animal donors such as pigs; improved biotechnological solutions such as total artificial hearts; and 3D printed organs developed from the recipient's own cells. These These solutions are in various stages of development, and they may or may not prove viable in terms of cost, functionality, and/or compatibility with the recipient's body. In this chapter, I ask not about the viability of these proposed solutions, but rather, about the acceptability of the various technologies to potential recipients. Simply put: were these organ transplant alternatives to become available, would patients agree to them? Analyzing answers from focus group interviews and surveys, I use the responses to show that individuals imagine these various technologies as familiar or foreign, self or other, clean or dirty, and so on. People envisage that using different different different materials will certainly affect their bodies but also their subjectivities. New biotechnologies are raising questions about altering subjectivity through body modification and the answers to these questions demonstrate ambiguity. 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Medical and health informatics  |2 bicssc 
653 |a organ transplantation; organ donation; nonhuman animal donors 
773 1 |t The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Body and Embodiment  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: 494a292f-ddb9-4750-9943-96cc21423b2d 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64613  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47837/1/Bookshelf_NBK559943.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication