Neuro-motor control and feed-forward models of locomotion in humans

Locomotion involves many different muscles and the need of controlling several degrees of freedom. Despite the Central Nervous System can finely control the contraction of individual muscles, emerging evidences indicate that strategies for the reduction of the complexity of movement and for compensa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2015
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
LEADER 05075namaa2200529uu 4500
001 doab54487
003 oapen
005 20210211
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210211s2015 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-2-88919-614-2 
020 |a 9782889196142 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-614-2  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PSAN  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Nadia Dominici  |4 aut 
720 1 |a Federica Tamburella  |4 aut 
720 1 |a Leonardo Gizzi  |4 aut 
720 1 |a Marco Iosa  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Neuro-motor control and feed-forward models of locomotion in humans 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 online resource (190 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Frontiers Research Topics 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Locomotion involves many different muscles and the need of controlling several degrees of freedom. Despite the Central Nervous System can finely control the contraction of individual muscles, emerging evidences indicate that strategies for the reduction of the complexity of movement and for compensating the sensorimotor delays may be adopted. Experimental evidences in animal and lately human model led to the concept of a central pattern generator (CPG) which suggests that circuitry within the distal part of CNS, i.e. spinal cord, can generate the basic locomotor patterns, even in the absence of sensory information. Different studies pointed out the role of CPG in the control of locomotion as well as others investigated the neuroplasticity of CPG allowing for gait recovery after spinal cord lesion. Literature was also focused on muscle synergies, i.e. the combination of (locomotor) functional modules, implemented in neuronal networks of the spinal cord, generating specific motor output by imposing a specific timing structure and appropriate weightings to muscle activations. Despite the great interest that this approach generated in the last years in the Scientific Community, large areas of investigations remain available for further improvement (e.g. the influence of afferent feedback and environmental constrains) for both experimental and simulated models. However, also supraspinal structures are involved during locomotion, and it has been shown that they are responsible for initiating and modifying the features of this basic rhythm, for stabilising the upright walking, and for coordinating movements in a dynamic changing environment. Furthermore, specific damages into spinal and supraspinal structures result in specific alterations of human locomotion, as evident in subjects with brain injuries such as stroke, brain trauma, or people with cerebral palsy, in people with death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra due to Parkinson's disease, or in subjects with cerebellar dysfunctions, such as patients with ataxia. The role of cerebellum during locomotion has been shown to be related to coordination and adaptation of movements. Cerebellum is the structure of CNS where are conceivably located the internal models, that are neural representations miming meaningful aspects of our body, such as input/output characteristics of sensorimotor system. Internal model control has been shown to be at the basis of motor strategies for compensating delays or lacks in sensorimotor feedbacks, and some aspects of locomotion need predictive internal control, especially for improving gait dynamic stability, for avoiding obstacles or when sensory feedback is altered or lacking. Furthermore, despite internal model concepts are widespread in neuroscience and neurocognitive science, neurorehabilitation paid far too little attention to the potential role of internal model control on gait recovery. Many important scientists have contributed to this Research Topic with original studies, computational studies, and review articles focused on neural circuits and internal models involved in the control of human locomotion, aiming at understanding the role played in control of locomotion of different neural circuits located at brain, cerebellum, and spinal cord levels. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Neurosciences  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Brain 
653 |a central pattern generator 
653 |a Cerebellum 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a feedforward 
653 |a Gait 
653 |a internal model 
653 |a Locomotion 
653 |a Spinal Cord 
653 |a Walking 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1623/neuro-motor-control-and-feed-forward-models-of-locomotion-in-humans  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/54487  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication