Pyrrhic Progress The History of Antibiotics in Anglo-American Food Production

Pyrrhic Progress analyses over half a century of antibiotic use, regulation, and resistance in US and British food production. Mass-introduced after 1945, antibiotics helped revolutionize post-war agriculture. Food producers used antibiotics to prevent and treat disease, protect plants, preserve foo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: New Brunswick Rutgers University Press 2020
Series:Critical Issues in Health and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 03191namaa2200541uu 4500
001 doab35428
003 oapen
005 20210210
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210210s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780813591483 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a M  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a NH  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Kirchhelle, Claas  |4 aut 
720 1 |a Apple, Rina D.  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Apple, Rina D.  |4 oth 
720 1 |a Golden, Janet  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Golden, Janet  |4 oth 
245 0 0 |a Pyrrhic Progress  |b The History of Antibiotics in Anglo-American Food Production 
260 |a New Brunswick  |b Rutgers University Press  |c 2020 
300 |a 1 online resource (451 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Critical Issues in Health and Medicine 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Pyrrhic Progress analyses over half a century of antibiotic use, regulation, and resistance in US and British food production. Mass-introduced after 1945, antibiotics helped revolutionize post-war agriculture. Food producers used antibiotics to prevent and treat disease, protect plants, preserve food, and promote animals' growth. Many soon became dependent on routine antibiotic use to sustain and increase production. The resulting growth of antibiotic infrastructures came at a price. Critics blamed antibiotics for leaving dangerous residues in food, enabling bad animal welfare, and selecting for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria, which could no longer be treated with antibiotics. Pyrrhic Progress reconstructs the complicated negotiations that accompanied this process of risk prioritization between consumers, farmers, and regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Unsurprisingly, solutions differed: while Europeans implemented precautionary antibiotic restrictions to curb AMR, consumer concerns and cost-benefit assessments made US regulators focus on curbing drug residues in food. The result was a growing divergence of antibiotic stewardship and a rise of AMR. Kirchhelle's comprehensive analysis of evolving non-human antibiotic use and the historical complexities of antibiotic stewardship provides important insights for current debates on the global burden of AMR. 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a History  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Medicine and Nursing  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Anti Bacterial Agents 
653 |a Antibiotic 
653 |a Drug resistance 
653 |a food production 
653 |a history 
653 |a legislation drug 
653 |a microbial 
653 |a United Kingdom 
653 |a United States 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/35428  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22408/1/Bookshelf_NBK554200.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication