The Communism of Thought

The Communism of Thought takes as its point of departure a passage in a letter from Dionys Mascolo to Gilles Deleuze: "I have called this communism of thought in the past. And I placed it under the auspices of Hölderlin, who may have only fled thought because he was unable to live it: 'The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Brooklyn, NY punctum books 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02431namaa2200421uu 4500
001 doab31864
003 oapen
005 20210210
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210210s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780615986968 
020 |a P3.0059.1.00 
024 7 |a 10.21983/P3.0059.1.00  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPCF  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Munro, Michael  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a The Communism of Thought 
260 |a Brooklyn, NY  |b punctum books  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 online resource (90 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a The Communism of Thought takes as its point of departure a passage in a letter from Dionys Mascolo to Gilles Deleuze: "I have called this communism of thought in the past. And I placed it under the auspices of Hölderlin, who may have only fled thought because he was unable to live it: 'The life of the spirit between friends, the thoughts that form in the exchange of words, by writing or in person, are necessary to those who seek. Without that, we are by our own hands outside thought.'" What, in light of that imperative, is a correspondence? What is given to be understood by the word, let alone the phenomenon? What constitutes a correspondence? What occasions it? On what terms and according to what conditions may one enter into that exchange "necessary," in Hölderlin's words, "to those who seek"? Pursuant to what vicissitudes may it be conducted? And what end(s) might a correspondence come to have beyond the ostensible end that, to all appearances, it (inevitably) will be said to have had? 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Western philosophy, from c 1900 -  |2 bicssc 
653 |a commentary 
653 |a correspondence 
653 |a friendship 
653 |a Gilles Deleuze 
653 |a philosophy 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/31864  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25558/1/1004537.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication