Veto Power Institutional Design in the European Union

Veto rights can be a meaningful source of power only when leaving an organization is extremely unlikely. For example, small European states have periodically wielded their veto privileges to override the preferences of their larger, more economically and militarily powerful neighbors when negotiatin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2011
Series:New Comparative Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 02670namaa2200469uu 4500
001 doab27371
003 oapen
005 20210210
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210210s2011 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780472117932 
020 |a mpub.2012704 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.2012704  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
720 1 |a Slapin, Jonathan B.  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Veto Power  |b Institutional Design in the European Union 
260 |a Ann Arbor  |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2011 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a New Comparative Politics 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Veto rights can be a meaningful source of power only when leaving an organization is extremely unlikely. For example, small European states have periodically wielded their veto privileges to override the preferences of their larger, more economically and militarily powerful neighbors when negotiating European Union treaties, which require the unanimous consent of all EU members. Jonathan B. Slapin traces the historical development of the veto privilege in the EU and how a veto-or veto threat-has been employed in treaty negotiations of the past two decades. As he explains, the importance of veto power in treaty negotiations is one of the features that distinguishes the EU from other international organizations in which exit and expulsion threats play a greater role. At the same time, the prominence of veto power means that bargaining in the EU looks more like bargaining in a federal system. Slapin's findings have significant ramifications for the study of international negotiations, the design of international organizations, and European integration. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode 
546 |a English 
653 |a Amsterdam 
653 |a European integration 
653 |a European Union 
653 |a France 
653 |a Germany 
653 |a Intergovernmentalism 
653 |a Member state of the European Union 
653 |a Political Science 
653 |a Status quo 
653 |a Veto 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/27371  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/31768/1/625267.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication