Trust Responsibly Non-Evidential Virtue Epistemology

This book offers a defence of Wrightean epistemic entitlement, one of the most prominent approaches to hinge epistemology. It also systematically explores the connections between virtue epistemology and hinge epistemology. According to hinge epistemology, any human belief set is built within and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2024
Series:Routledge Studies in Epistemology
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 03131namaa2200421uu 4500
001 doab121658
003 oapen
005 20231117
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 231117s2024 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781003374466 
020 |a 9781003374466 
020 |a 9781032449074 
020 |a 9781032460987 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9781003374466  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPK  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Ohlhorst, Jakob  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Trust Responsibly  |b Non-Evidential Virtue Epistemology 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2024 
300 |a 1 online resource (160 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Routledge Studies in Epistemology 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a This book offers a defence of Wrightean epistemic entitlement, one of the most prominent approaches to hinge epistemology. It also systematically explores the connections between virtue epistemology and hinge epistemology. According to hinge epistemology, any human belief set is built within and upon a framework of pre-evidential propositions - hinges - that cannot be justified. Epistemic entitlement argues that we are entitled to trust our hinges. But there remains a problem. Entitlement is inherently unconstrained and arbitrary: We can be entitled to any hinge proposition under the right circumstances. In this book, the author argues that we need a non-arbitrariness clause that protects entitlement from defeat. This clause, he argues, is to require epistemic virtue. Virtuous cognitive dispositions provide the non-arbitrariness clause that protects entitlement from defeat. The epistemic character of the agent who holds a particular set of hinges tells us something about the hinges' epistemic status. Conversely, epistemic virtues are cognitive dispositions and capacities that rely on hinge propositions - without trusting in some hinges, we would be unable to exercise our virtues. Trust Responsibly will appeal to scholars and advanced students working on epistemology, Wittgenstein, and virtues. 
536 |a Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge  |2 bicssc 
653 |a arbitrariness;bizarreness;certainty;cognitive psychology;common sense;core cognition;deep disagreement;dual-process theory;entitlement;hinge epistemology;Jakob Ohlhorst;relativism;reliabilism;responsibilism;scepticism;skepticism;trust;virtue epistemology;Wittgenstein 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/121658  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/77020/1/9781000967258.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication