Meta-Science Towards a Science of Meaning and Complex Solutions

Science has lost its ethical imperatives as it moved away from a science of ought to a science of is. Subsequently, it might have answers for how we can address global challenges, such as climate change and poverty, but not why we should. This supposedly neutral stance leaves it to politics and reli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Groningen University of Groningen Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 03113namaa2200421uu 4500
001 doab121639
003 oapen
005 20231117
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 231117s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 648c59a2087f2 
020 |a 9789403430348 
024 7 |a 10.21827/648c59a2087f2  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Zwitter, Andrej  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Dome, Takuo  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Dome, Takuo  |4 oth 
720 1 |a Zwitter, Andrej  |4 oth 
245 0 0 |a Meta-Science  |b Towards a Science of Meaning and Complex Solutions 
260 |a Groningen  |b University of Groningen Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 online resource (252 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Science has lost its ethical imperatives as it moved away from a science of ought to a science of is. Subsequently, it might have answers for how we can address global challenges, such as climate change and poverty, but not why we should. This supposedly neutral stance leaves it to politics and religions (in the sense of non-scientific fields of social engagement) to fill in the values. The problem is that through this concession, science implicitly acknowledges that it is not of universal relevance. Objective knowledge, as Karl Popper calls for, might be less easily attainable in the world of ideas and within the confines of scientific idealism. However, if ideas, values and meaning have equal claim to be drivers of change in the sense of causation, aspiring to identify objective knowledge about the world of ideas and of meaning is necessary. If the sciences and disciplines aim to give objectively valid reasons for our actions (and for how to address global challenges), we need to elevate the study of meaning beyond the cultural, disciplinary and ideational delineations. We need to come to a meta understanding of values and meaning equal to objective knowledge about the material world. But differently than in the material world this meta understanding needs to incorporate individual and subjective experiences as cornerstones of objectivity on a meta-level. We need a science of meaning; one that can scientifically answer Kant's third question of "what may we hope for". 
536 |a Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Sustainable development; Human flourishing; Metascience; Philosophy of science; Global challenges; Complex solutions 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/121639  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/85189/1/New_Meta-Science.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication