Chapter Given N forecasting models, what to do?

This work evaluates the forecasting performances of different models using data on Italian unemployment and employment rates over the years 2004-2022 at the monthly frequency. The logic of this work is inspired by the series of M-Competitions, i.e. the tradition of competitions organized to test the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Florence Firenze University Press, Genova University Press 2023
Series:Proceedings e report
Subjects:
Online Access:Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication
Open Access: DOAB, download the publication
LEADER 03576namaa2200445uu 4500
001 doab112105
003 oapen
005 20230808
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 230808s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 979-12-215-0106-3.55 
020 |a 9791221501063 
024 7 |a 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.55  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a J  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Culotta, Fabrizio  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Chapter Given N forecasting models, what to do? 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press, Genova University Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 online resource (6 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Proceedings e report 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a This work evaluates the forecasting performances of different models using data on Italian unemployment and employment rates over the years 2004-2022 at the monthly frequency. The logic of this work is inspired by the series of M-Competitions, i.e. the tradition of competitions organized to test the forecasting performances of classical and innovative models. Given N competing models, only one winner is selected. The types of forecasting models range from the Exponential Smoothing family to ARIMA-like models, to their hybridization, to machine learning and neural network engines. Model combinations through various ensemble techniques are also considered. Once the observational period is split between the training and test set, the estimated forecasting models are ranked in terms of fitting on the training set and in terms of their forecast accuracy on the test set. Results confirm that it does not exist yet a single superior universal model. On the contrary, the ranking of different forecasting models is specific to the adopted training set. Secondly, results confirm that performances of machine learning and neural network models offer satisfactory alternatives and complementarities to the traditional models like ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing. Finally, the results stress the importance of model ensemble techniques as a solution to model uncertainty as well as a tool to improve forecast accuracy. The flexibility provided by a rich set of different forecasting models, and the possibility of combining them, together represent an advantage for decision-makers often constrained to adopt solely pure, not-combined, forecasting models. Overall, this work can represent a first step toward the construction of a semi-automatic forecasting algorithm, which has become an essential tool for both trained and untrained eyes in an era of data-driven decision-making. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Society & social sciences  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Decision-making and forecast accuracy 
653 |a Forecasting performances 
653 |a M-Competitions 
653 |a Model ensemble techniques 
653 |a Model types 
773 1 |t ASA 2022 Data-Driven Decision Making  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: b47c1d1a-d6e3-44fe-840c-5a040427b0c4 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/112105  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/74927/1/9791221501063-55.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication