LEADER 04230namaa2200469uu 4500
001 doab107964
003 oapen
005 20230726
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 230726s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780472055906 
020 |a 9780472075904 
020 |a mpub.12414985 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.12414985  |2 doi 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JPB  |2 bicssc 
720 1 |a Grömping, Max  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Grömping, Max  |4 oth 
720 1 |a Teets, Jessica C.  |4 edt 
720 1 |a Teets, Jessica C.  |4 oth 
245 0 0 |a Lobbying the Autocrat  |b The Dynamics of Policy Advocacy in Nondemocracies 
260 |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 online resource (368 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Although authoritarian countries often repress independent citizen activity, lobbying by civil society organizations is actually a widespread phenomenon. Using case studies such as China, Russia, Belarus, Cambodia, Malaysia, Montenegro, Turkey, and Zimbabwe, Lobbying the Autocrat shows that citizen advocacy organizations carve out niches in the authoritarian policy process, even influencing policy outcomes. The cases cover a range of autocratic regime types (one-party, multi-party, personalist) on different continents, and encompass different systems of government to explore citizen advocacy ranging from issues such as social welfare, women's rights, election reform, environmental protection, and land rights. They show how civil society has developed adaptive capacities to the changing levels of political repression and built resilience through 'tactful contention' strategies. Thus, within the bounds set by the authoritarian regimes, adaptive lobbying may still bring about localized responsiveness and representation. However, the challenging conditions of authoritarian advocacy systems identified throughout this volume present challenges for both advocates and autocrats alike. The former are pushed by an environment of constant threat and uncertainty into a precarious dance with the dictator: just the right amount of acquiescence and assertiveness, private persuasion and public pressure, and the flexibility to change quickly to suit different situations. An adaptive lobbyist survives and may even thrive in such conditions, while others often face dire consequences. For the autocrat on the other hand, the more they stifle the associational sphere in an effort to prevent mass mobilization, the less they will reap the informational benefits associated with it. This volume synthesizes the findings of the comparative cases to build a framework for understanding how civil society effectively lobbies inside authoritarian countries. 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Comparative politics  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Politics & government  |2 bicssc 
653 |a civil society, authoritarian regimes, interest groups, policy advocacy, comparative authoritarianism, informational autocracy, China, Russia, Belarus, Cambodia, Malaysia, Montenegro, Turkey, Zimbabwe, advocacy, social welfare, women's rights, election reform, environmental protection, land rights, adaptive capacities, political repression, adaptive lobbying, state-society relationship, interest representation, lobbying, NGOs, developing countries, competitive authoritarianism, dictatorship, autocracy, electoral authoritarianism, democratization, liberalization, responsiveness, welfare, policymaking, governance 
793 0 |a DOAB Library. 
856 4 0 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/107964  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/63633/1/9780472903221.pdf  |7 0  |z Open Access: DOAB, download the publication